The imposition of corruption criminal acts: handling corruption cases in Indonesia number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST

The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sariat Arifia (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET), 2022-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The imposition of corruption offense in case Number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST, where the imposition of the offense of participation in acts of gratification is separated into two categories, namely those who give bribes and those who are bribed. It is unclear how the Judge differentiates those who give bribes and those who are bribed. Thus, the research question is as follows: How is the implementation of participating in corruption cases in accordance with the case judgment number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/JKT.PST? Second, how is criminal behavior in corruption instances regulated in Indonesia? The research method employed is normative juridical, which means that it is based on an examination of pertinent laws and regulations. The study's conclusions include the absence of reason and logic in the judges' deliberations and decisions regarding the classification of bribery in case number. 28/PID.SUS.TPK/2020/ JKT.PST. Second, there is a legal vacuum or loophole in which no rules have a clear formula for classifying those who give bribes or those who are bribed. According to these two results, the regulation of participation in criminal acts of corruption still need conceptual and technical refinement in the future
Item Description:2477-8524
2502-8103
10.29210/020221694