Water quality in rural Greenland - acceptability and safety

The low proportion of households with piped drinking water in Greenlandic settlements - and elsewhere in the Arctic, leads to improvised methods of household water storage and water saving practices that could present a risk for public health.This interview-based study investigated the perceptions o...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Principais autores: Judith Y.A. Maréchal (Autor), Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen (Autor), Pernille Erland Jensen (Autor)
Formato: Livro
Publicado em: Elsevier, 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8452a7c8ef304436a9c46f2b4adcf0fd
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Judith Y.A. Maréchal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lisbeth Truelstrup Hansen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pernille Erland Jensen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Water quality in rural Greenland - acceptability and safety 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2023-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2773-0492 
500 |a 10.1016/j.heha.2023.100065 
520 |a The low proportion of households with piped drinking water in Greenlandic settlements - and elsewhere in the Arctic, leads to improvised methods of household water storage and water saving practices that could present a risk for public health.This interview-based study investigated the perceptions of safety and acceptability of the water supply in rural Greenlandic households. The bacterial quality of the water distributed by the public supply before and after storage in the homes, of alternative water sourced from nature by the users themselves, and of shared handwash basins used in un-piped homes, was analyzed.The treated water distributed by the rural Greenlandic water supply was acceptable to most users, although half of them expressed concerns about its quality, and distrusted the state of the infrastructure delivering piped water. For drinking, most respondents preferred untreated water from nature, but a majority used mainly piped water for practical reasons of access. The microbial quality of the public water supply met legislative requirements in most cases, but was found to deteriorate during both distribution to some taps, and storage in the homes, which constitutes a challenge to the reliable provision of safe water to users. Water from alternative sources showed slightly higher heterotrophic plate counts (HPC) than piped water, but no Escherichia coli. As for washbasins, they were found to have high levels of contamination in all three bacterial parameters investigated (HPC, coliforms and E. coli), indicating a possible transmission route for pathogens.In conclusion, while the quality of treated water was overall good at distribution, the water saving and storage practices developed to compensate for the lack of piping may threaten public health. Alternative water sources are culturally important and trusted by users, although the possible impact of changes in climate and land use on the reliability of their quality is unknown. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Drinking water 
690 |a Water storage 
690 |a Hygiene 
690 |a Arctic 
690 |a Resilience 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
690 |a Environmental sciences 
690 |a GE1-350 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Hygiene and Environmental Health Advances, Vol 7, Iss , Pp 100065- (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773049223000211 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2773-0492 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8452a7c8ef304436a9c46f2b4adcf0fd  |z Connect to this object online.