The Collective Impact Index (CII): A New Instrument to Evaluate and Foster Collaborative Partnership in Public Health practice

Background or Objectives: Collective Impact (CI) is the sum of collaborative actions through coalition building to examine and address issues that threaten public health. We sought to develop an instrument to measure CI across diverse health-related organizations. Methods: The study was performed in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hamisu M Salihu, MD, PhD (Author), Roneé E Wilson, PhD, MPH (Author), Estrellita "Lo" Berry, MA (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Global Health and Education Projects, Inc., 2018-11-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_84f9dee5d232453d9d1d10e4955f43e6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hamisu M Salihu, MD, PhD  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Roneé E Wilson, PhD, MPH  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Estrellita "Lo" Berry, MA  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The Collective Impact Index (CII): A New Instrument to Evaluate and Foster Collaborative Partnership in Public Health practice 
260 |b Global Health and Education Projects, Inc.,   |c 2018-11-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.21106/ijma.265 
500 |a 2161-8674 
500 |a 2161-864X 
520 |a Background or Objectives: Collective Impact (CI) is the sum of collaborative actions through coalition building to examine and address issues that threaten public health. We sought to develop an instrument to measure CI across diverse health-related organizations. Methods: The study was performed in 5 phases initiated with a comprehensive literature review through the generation of candidate items using a deductive instrument development approach. A matrix was then created to map assembled items onto related CI domains. An one-hundred and nine (n=109) item questionnaire covering multiple items per domain was administered to 200 health-related organizations selected randomly throughout the United States. Survey data were evaluated using Principal Component Analysis and Kaiser criterion or eigenvalue-greater-than-one rule was the factor retention method utilized. Results: Based on Kaiser's eigenvalue criteria and communality estimates, the number of items across the five domains of CI was reduced from 109 to 20, with 4 items populating each subdomain. All communality estimates in the final instrument had values > 0.6, which was sufficiently adequate as per Kaiser's criterion. Conclusion and Global Health Implications: This pilot study demonstrates CI represents a multifactorial concept with domains that are multi-dimensional capturing diverse aspects of a construct. We developed the first measure of CI for public health practice. The index bears potential utility for assessing and monitoring areas of strengths and weaknesses within collaborative partnerships across the spectrum of population health. Key words: Collaborative Partnerships. CI. Federal Healthy Start. Program Evaluation. Index. Public Health Practice Copyright © 2018 Salihu et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Maternal and Child Health and AIDS, Vol 7, Iss 1 (2018) 
787 0 |n https://www.mchandaids.org/index.php/IJMA/article/view/265 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2161-8674 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2161-864X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/84f9dee5d232453d9d1d10e4955f43e6  |z Connect to this object online.