Radiation Hormesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Book |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing,
2006-07-01T00:00:00Z.
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | doaj_85041e8dfe694f4388b62f349162aca0 | ||
| 042 | |a dc | ||
| 100 | 1 | 0 | |a T. D. Luckey |e author |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Radiation Hormesis: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly |
| 260 | |b SAGE Publishing, |c 2006-07-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
| 500 | |a 1559-3258 | ||
| 500 | |a 10.2203/dose-response.06-102.Luckey | ||
| 520 | |a Three aspects of hormesis with low doses of ionizing radiation are presented: the good, the bad, and the ugly. The good is acceptance by France, Japan, and China of the thousands of studies showing stimulation and/or benefit, with no harm, from low dose irradiation. This includes thousands of people who live in good health with high background radiation. The bad is the nonacceptance of radiation hormesis by the U. S. and most other governments; their linear no threshold (LNT) concept promulgates fear of all radiation and produces laws which have no basis in mammalian physiology. The LNT concept leads to poor health, unreasonable medicine and oppressed industries. The ugly is decades of deception by medical and radiation committees which refuse to consider valid evidence of radiation hormesis in cancer, other diseases, and health. Specific examples are provided for the good, the bad, and the ugly in radiation hormesis. | ||
| 546 | |a EN | ||
| 690 | |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology | ||
| 690 | |a RM1-950 | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
| 786 | 0 | |n Dose-Response, Vol 4 (2006) | |
| 787 | 0 | |n https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.06-102.Luckey | |
| 787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1559-3258 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/85041e8dfe694f4388b62f349162aca0 |z Connect to this object online. |