Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study

AbstractBackground Maltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camilla Hoffmann Merrild (Author), Hans Christian Kjeldsen (Author), Ioanna Milidou (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Taylor & Francis Group, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_850fbe1a43da485fa8db9f16694a7e0b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Camilla Hoffmann Merrild  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hans Christian Kjeldsen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ioanna Milidou  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Management of child maltreatment suspicions in general practice: a mixed methods study 
260 |b Taylor & Francis Group,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1080/02813432.2023.2178851 
500 |a 1502-7724 
500 |a 0281-3432 
520 |a AbstractBackground Maltreated children have many long-term consequences throughout their lives, but often maltreated children are not recognised in time by professionals. General practice could be central to the early recognition of child maltreatment due to the long-term relationship with families.Objective How do general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) deal with suspected maltreatment in children below 18 years of age, and which factors influence them to report cases to social authorities.Design and setting A mixed methods study set in general practice in Denmark.Method and subjects We combined data from a nationwide questionnaire with observations from five clinics and 20 interviews with GPs and PNs. We explored our data using the concept of uncertainty as a driver that shapes action and decision-making in general practice.Results Most GPs (94%) said they would discuss cases of suspected child maltreatment with social services, but in many cases they would prefer to discuss their suspicions with a colleague first (83%) - most likely where there are no clear-cut signs. The qualitative data added nuance to these findings by highlighting the difficulty of communicating across sectors, the importance of maintaining a connection with the child's family, and practicing watchful waiting.Conclusion General practice has an opportunity to act early in cases of suspected child maltreatment if uncertainty is accepted as a critical part of the process of reaching a diagnosis. Communication across sectors is key, as is support for GPs with suspicions and for families in need of help.Key pointsGPs are often thought to underreport child maltreatment but despite low levels of reporting, this does not mean they ignore it.Building on the connection with the family, making follow appointments, and discussing suspicions with colleagues are typical of how GPs manage suspicions of child abuse.Accepting uncertainty as a condition of raising the alarm could help GPs to act quickly to support children at risk of abuse. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Primary care 
690 |a child health 
690 |a maltreatment 
690 |a abuse 
690 |a diagnostics 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Vol 41, Iss 1, Pp 81-90 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/02813432.2023.2178851 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0281-3432 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1502-7724 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/850fbe1a43da485fa8db9f16694a7e0b  |z Connect to this object online.