Exploring the Domains of Gender as Measured by a New Gender, Pain and Expectations Scale

Background: While sex- or gender-based differences in pain expression have been documented, exploration of traditionally genderized traits on pain has been hampered by the lack of strong measurement tools. This study evaluated the structural validity of a 16-item ?Gender personality traits? subscale...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Ghodrati (Author), David M. Walton (Author), Joy C. MacDermid (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Mary Ann Liebert, 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_853459b30bf74417a144d38ae666ebc1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maryam Ghodrati  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David M. Walton  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joy C. MacDermid  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Exploring the Domains of Gender as Measured by a New Gender, Pain and Expectations Scale 
260 |b Mary Ann Liebert,   |c 2021-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1089/WHR.2020.0109 
500 |a 2688-4844 
520 |a Background: While sex- or gender-based differences in pain expression have been documented, exploration of traditionally genderized traits on pain has been hampered by the lack of strong measurement tools. This study evaluated the structural validity of a 16-item ?Gender personality traits? subscale of a recently developed Gender, Pain and Expectations Scale (GPES). Methods: Data were drawn from an existing database of 248 participants (65.7% female). Maximum likelihood-based confirmatory factor analysis was carried out while considering the conceptual meaningfulness of subscales to evaluate the factor structure identified by these traits. Construct validity was explored using a priori hypotheses regarding anticipated mean differences in scores between biological male and female participants. Results: A meaningful factor structure could not be defined with all 16 items. Through conceptual and statistical triangulation a three-factor structure informed by 10 items was identified that satisfied acceptable fit criteria. The factors were termed ?Emotive,? ?Relationship-Oriented,? and ?Goal-Oriented.? Evidence of construct validity was supported through significant sex-based differences (p???0.02) in the expected directions for all three subscales. Conclusions: Review of the items in the three factors led the researchers to endorse a move away from naming these ?masculine? and ?feminine,? rather focusing on the nature of the traits: ?Relationship-oriented,? ?Emotive,? and ?Goal-oriented.? Implications for researchers conducting sex/gender-based pain research are discussed. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02711085. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a gender 
690 |a gender roles 
690 |a GPES 
690 |a pain 
690 |a psychometrics 
690 |a Gynecology and obstetrics 
690 |a RG1-991 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Women's Health Reports, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 87-96 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/WHR.2020.0109 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2688-4844 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/853459b30bf74417a144d38ae666ebc1  |z Connect to this object online.