In Vivo Detection of External Apical Root Resorption Induced by Apical Periodontitis Using Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Objective: To compare the accuracy of periapical radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the detection of external apical root resorption (EARR) due to root canal contamination. Material and Methods: Dog's teeth with experimentally induced root resorption due to root canal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie Diaz Huamán (Author), Maya Fernanda Manfrin Arnez (Author), Fernanda Maria Machado Pereira Cabral de Oliveira (Author), Andiara De Rossi (Author), Léa Assed Bezerra Silva (Author), Francisco Wanderley Garcia Paula-Silva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB), 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_853eada3300b4778a1cdcc07bcc1bacf
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Stephanie Diaz Huamán  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Maya Fernanda Manfrin Arnez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fernanda Maria Machado Pereira Cabral de Oliveira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Andiara De Rossi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Léa Assed Bezerra Silva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Francisco Wanderley Garcia Paula-Silva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a In Vivo Detection of External Apical Root Resorption Induced by Apical Periodontitis Using Periapical Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 
260 |b Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB),   |c 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1519-0501 
500 |a 1983-4632 
520 |a Objective: To compare the accuracy of periapical radiography (PR) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for the detection of external apical root resorption (EARR) due to root canal contamination. Material and Methods: Dog's teeth with experimentally induced root resorption due to root canal contamination underwent or not root canal treatment (n=62). True positives (TP), false positives (FP), true negatives (TN), and false negatives (FN) in PR and CBCT diagnoses were determined using histopathologic findings as the gold standard. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and diagnostic accuracy (TP + TN) in the diagnosis of EARR were calculated. Data were compared using chi-squared test (⍺=0.05). Results: EARR was detected in 35% of roots by PR, in 47% by CBCT, and in 50% of the roots by microscopy (p=0.03 PR versus microscopy; p=0.67 CBCT versusmicroscopy). Overall, CBCT produced more accurate diagnoses than PR (p=0.008). PR and CBCT allowed the identification of large resorption in 100% of the cases and showed the same accuracy. However, for small resorptions, PR showed an accuracy of 0.83, whereas CBCT showed an accuracy of 0.96 (p=0.003). Conclusion: Cone-beam computed tomography showed higher accuracy in detecting external apical root resorption of endodontic origin. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a PT 
690 |a Tooth Resorption 
690 |a Diagnostic Imaging 
690 |a Radiography, Dental 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada, Vol 22 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://revista.uepb.edu.br/PBOCI/article/view/1318 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1519-0501 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1983-4632 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/853eada3300b4778a1cdcc07bcc1bacf  |z Connect to this object online.