Off-label use of oncology drugs: national survey results
Purpose: identify by means of a survey the off-label treatments more often used in the oncohaematology area, as well as to know the established procedures and criteria used to authorise those treatments. Methods: a four-section survey was designed: 1) demographic data and hospital activity, 2) Off-l...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
Elsevier,
2015-09-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_8580164c6e3c4ee38c0834ed877f20a5 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Eva González-Haba Peña |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María José Agustín Ferrández |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Irene Mangues Bafalluy |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Nicolás Alfredo López |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María Dolores Fraga Fuentes |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Roberto Marín Gil |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María José Martínez Bautista |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María José Martínez Bautista |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a María José Martínez Bautista |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ana Clopés Estela |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Off-label use of oncology drugs: national survey results |
260 | |b Elsevier, |c 2015-09-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.7399/fh.2015.39.5.8979 | ||
500 | |a 1130-6343 | ||
500 | |a 2171-8695 | ||
520 | |a Purpose: identify by means of a survey the off-label treatments more often used in the oncohaematology area, as well as to know the established procedures and criteria used to authorise those treatments. Methods: a four-section survey was designed: 1) demographic data and hospital activity, 2) Off-label treatments protocol, 3) Approval criteria and 4) Off-label oncology treatments conducted during the last year. Results: in 42.1% of the hospitals it's needed an authorisation before dispensing in more tan 80% of the treatments. The most influential factor in the approval-dispensation system is the available evidence. The consent of the hospital management with previous Pharmacy department's report was the most common authorisation procedure. 55.3% of the hospitals settled specific patient criteria to help the decision-making altogether with the available safety and efficacy data of the drug for the requested indication. In most centers a lower level of evidence is accepted if there are no therapeutic alternatives as well as in tumors of low prevalence. Most of the centers have not clearly established a criterion of effectiveness to consider a benefit as clinically relevant, nor the cost-effectiveness threshold for approving a FFT. Conclusions: there is a great variability in the off-label treatments use and also in the criteria used for its approval. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
546 | |a ES | ||
690 | |a Off-label use | ||
690 | |a ; Antineoplastic drugs | ||
690 | |a ; Non-approved indications | ||
690 | |a Drugs in especial situations. | ||
690 | |a Pharmacy and materia medica | ||
690 | |a RS1-441 | ||
690 | |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology | ||
690 | |a RM1-950 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Farmacia Hospitalaria, Vol 39, Iss 5, Pp 275-287 (2015) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.aulamedica.es/fh/pdf/8979.pdf | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1130-6343 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/2171-8695 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8580164c6e3c4ee38c0834ed877f20a5 |z Connect to this object online. |