Moodle and Telegram to develop students' language performance and knowledge co-construction in technology-enhanced CLIL

This study compared Moodle and Telegram as mobile-instant messaging (MIM) to understand how the platforms performed in technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning (TECLIL) settings. It involved 68 English for Academic Purpose (EAP) students enrolled in two groups, i.e., Moodle group...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Imamyartha (Author), Utami Widiati (Author), Mirjam Anugerahwati (Author), Afendi Hamat (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universitas Syiah Kuala, 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_85d5a18e8c8040c7b5694b45175ed847
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a David Imamyartha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Utami Widiati  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mirjam Anugerahwati  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Afendi Hamat  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Moodle and Telegram to develop students' language performance and knowledge co-construction in technology-enhanced CLIL 
260 |b Universitas Syiah Kuala,   |c 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2355-2794 
500 |a 2461-0275 
500 |a 10.24815/siele.v10i2.28295 
520 |a This study compared Moodle and Telegram as mobile-instant messaging (MIM) to understand how the platforms performed in technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning (TECLIL) settings. It involved 68 English for Academic Purpose (EAP) students enrolled in two groups, i.e., Moodle group and Telegram group. Using the mixed-method design, the study garnered quantitative data through pre- and post-tests of language performance coupled with post-tests of spoken presentation, content knowledge, and collective knowledge co-construction. Qualitative data concerning the interaction patterns in online discussion forums were amassed by retrieving students' postings on both platforms. This study garnered additional quantitative data as covariates, which involved a survey of technology acceptance and a survey of teacher evaluation. Upon analysis, paired sample t-test was operative to identify noteworthy differences between groups with respect to technology acceptance, evaluation of teacher performance, language performance, and content knowledge. For the qualitative inquiry, thread analysis on the interaction patterns in both groups was conducted to scrutinize their depth of knowledge co-construction. Although the interaction trends in both platforms mark the dominance of knowledge sharing, the findings lend credence to the stronger potential of Moodle to empower students' in-depth knowledge co-construction while exercising their subject-specific language performance. For deep engagement in knowledge co-construction and authentic language use, teachers need to provide appropriate scaffolding through modeling effective collaboration, making explicit the characteristics of quality discussion, and establishing a mutual understanding of what students need to achieve in the online discussion forum. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a knowledge co-construction 
690 |a language performance 
690 |a moodle 
690 |a teclil 
690 |a telegram 
690 |a Language and Literature 
690 |a P 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Studies in English Language and Education, Vol 10, Iss 2, Pp 863-883 (2023) 
787 0 |n https://jurnal.usk.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/28295 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2355-2794 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2461-0275 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/85d5a18e8c8040c7b5694b45175ed847  |z Connect to this object online.