Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners

Abstract Background Cancer risk assessment tools are designed to help detect cancer risk in symptomatic individuals presenting to primary care. An early detection of cancer risk could mean early referral for investigations, diagnosis and treatment, helping to address late diagnosis of cancer. It is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph N. A. Akanuwe (Author), Sharon Black (Author), Sara Owen (Author), Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_85e026b8d3604e769840a4f8dc23e7f7
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Joseph N. A. Akanuwe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sharon Black  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sara Owen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Communicating cancer risk in the primary care consultation when using a cancer risk assessment tool: Qualitative study with service users and practitioners 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2020-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1369-7625 
500 |a 1369-6513 
500 |a 10.1111/hex.13016 
520 |a Abstract Background Cancer risk assessment tools are designed to help detect cancer risk in symptomatic individuals presenting to primary care. An early detection of cancer risk could mean early referral for investigations, diagnosis and treatment, helping to address late diagnosis of cancer. It is not clear how best cancer risk may be communicated to patients when using a cancer risk assessment tool to assess their risk of developing cancer. Objective We aimed to explore the perspectives of service users and primary care practitioners on communicating cancer risk information to patients, when using QCancer, a cancer risk assessment tool. Design A qualitative study involving the use of individual interviews and focus groups. Setting and participants Conducted in primary care settings in Lincolnshire with a convenience sample of 36 participants (19 service users who were members of the public) and 17 primary care practitioners (general practitioners and practice nurses). Results Participants suggested ways to improve communication of cancer risk information: personalizing risk information; involving patients in use of the tool; sharing risk information openly; and providing sufficient time when using the tool during consultations. Conclusion Communication of cancer risk information is complex and difficult. We identified strategies for improving communication with patients involving cancer risk estimations in primary care consultations. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a cancer risk assessment tools 
690 |a cancer risk communication 
690 |a general practitioners 
690 |a primary care 
690 |a QCancer 
690 |a service user views 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Health Expectations, Vol 23, Iss 2, Pp 509-518 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13016 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-6513 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1369-7625 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/85e026b8d3604e769840a4f8dc23e7f7  |z Connect to this object online.