Using Different Low-Profile Abutments for Assisting Mandibular Implant Overdenture: A Split-Mouth Study

Background. Using a pair of different low-profile abutments to assist mandibular implant overdenture (MIOD) in limited restorative space is questionable due to the different morphology. Objective. To investigate the marginal bone level (MBL) change and peri-implant-tissue health (PITH) around a pair...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ahmed K. Khalifa (VerfasserIn), Mohammad Mahmoud Alokda (VerfasserIn), Mohamed Moustafa Said (VerfasserIn)
Format: Buch
Veröffentlicht: Hindawi Limited, 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_865f43f3719f4488a6050d255a683514
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ahmed K. Khalifa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mohammad Mahmoud Alokda  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mohamed Moustafa Said  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Using Different Low-Profile Abutments for Assisting Mandibular Implant Overdenture: A Split-Mouth Study 
260 |b Hindawi Limited,   |c 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1687-8736 
500 |a 10.1155/2022/8738220 
520 |a Background. Using a pair of different low-profile abutments to assist mandibular implant overdenture (MIOD) in limited restorative space is questionable due to the different morphology. Objective. To investigate the marginal bone level (MBL) change and peri-implant-tissue health (PITH) around a pair of OT Equator® and Locator® suprastructures assisting MIOD. Methods. Seventeen edentulous patients received MIOD assisted by OT Equator® and Locator®. MBL change was investigated at the implant loading (T1), after six months (T2) and twelve months (T3) of implant loading. PITH was evaluated at T2 and T3. Results. There was within abutment significant difference in MBL change after T2 and T3 of loading for Locator (0.05 ± 0.02 and 0.32 ± 0.08, respectively) P=0.01; and for Equator (0.11 ± 0.08 and 0.21 ± 0.09, respectively) P=0.01. Also, there was a significant difference between Locator and Equator on the modified plaque index (MPI) after T3 P=0.01. The significant results were recorded for the MPI at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.92 ± 0.26 and 1.5 ± 0.51, respectively) P=0.01 and for Equator (0.82 ± 0.26 and 1.42 ± 0.51, respectively) P=0.003. For modified bleeding index, there was significant difference at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.57 ± 0.19 and 1.14 ± 0.41, respectively) P=0.03 and for Equator (0.46 ± 0.22 and 1.07 ± 0.41, respectively) P=0.01. For gingival index, there was significant difference at T2 and T3 for Locator (0.57 ± 0.11 and 1.28 ± 0.35, respectively) P=0.001 and for Equator (0.35 ± 0.21 and 1.1 ± 0.46, respectively) P=0.001. Conclusions. Using different pairs of the low-profile OT Equator® and Locator® abutments to assist MIOD is clinically acceptable based on the MBL change and PITH outcomes. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Dentistry, Vol 2022 (2022) 
787 0 |n http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8738220 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1687-8736 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/865f43f3719f4488a6050d255a683514  |z Connect to this object online.