Evaluation of Melanoma Thickness with Clinical Close-up and Dermoscopic Images Using a Convolutional Neural Network

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in discriminating between invasive and in situ melanomas. The aim of this study was to analyse how a CNN model, integrating both clinical close-up and dermoscopic images, performed compared with 6 independent dermatologists. The secondary aim w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Gillstedt (Author), Ludwig Mannius (Author), John Paoli (Author), Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz (Author), Julia Fougelberg (Author), Eva Johansson Backman (Author), Jenna Pakka (Author), Oscar Zaar (Author), Sam Polesie (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Medical Journals Sweden, 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have shown promise in discriminating between invasive and in situ melanomas. The aim of this study was to analyse how a CNN model, integrating both clinical close-up and dermoscopic images, performed compared with 6 independent dermatologists. The secondary aim was to address which clinical and dermoscopic features dermatologists found to be suggestive of invasive and in situ melanomas, respectively. A retrospective investigation was conducted including 1,578 cases of paired images of invasive (n = 728, 46.1%) and in situ melanomas (n = 850, 53.9%). All images were obtained from the Department of Dermatology and Venereology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital and were randomized to a training set (n = 1,078), a validation set (n = 200) and a test set (n = 300). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) among the dermatologists ranged from 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.70-0.81) to 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.85). The combined dermatologists' AUC was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.86), which was significantly higher than the CNN model (0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.78, p = 0.001). Three of the dermatologists significantly outperformed the CNN. Shiny white lines, atypical blue-white structures and polymorphous vessels displayed a moderate interobserver agreement, and these features also correlated with invasive melanoma. Prospective trials are needed to address the clinical usefulness of CNN models in this setting.
Item Description:10.2340/actadv.v102.2681
0001-5555
1651-2057