Evaluation of change in surface enamel microhardness in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance therapy - A randomized control trial

Aim: This study aims at determining the amount of enamel decalcification in terms of microhardness. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients requiring treatment by extraction method for Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion were selected for the study. Twenty patients were randomly divided...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ramya Rajendran (Author), V Sudhakar (Author), R Sumanth Rangarajan (Author), Anandadevi Chinnasamy (Author), G Vasupradha (Author), J Sathiya Jeeva (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_86f1b9ab0f8e471e9403e2bd29a41c1a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ramya Rajendran  |e author 
700 1 0 |a V Sudhakar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a R Sumanth Rangarajan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anandadevi Chinnasamy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a G Vasupradha  |e author 
700 1 0 |a J Sathiya Jeeva  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Evaluation of change in surface enamel microhardness in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance therapy - A randomized control trial 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0975-7406 
500 |a 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_259_21 
520 |a Aim: This study aims at determining the amount of enamel decalcification in terms of microhardness. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients requiring treatment by extraction method for Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion were selected for the study. Twenty patients were randomly divided into control group and experimental group. In the control group (n = 40), extraction of permanent first premolars was done on day 1 of bonding to assess the Vickers hardness number (VHN) of enamel surface, and in the experimental group (n = 40), extraction of the contralateral premolars was done on the 28th day after bonding to assess the VHN of enamel surface. The values are tabulated and analyzed by SPSS software. Results: There is significant surface enamel dissolution of enamel crystals in the experimental group compared to the control group, and a statistically significant difference in VHN is evident between the control and experimental groups. The surface enamel dissolution (VHN) is not significant difference noted between mandibular and maxillary premolars of the control and experimental groups. Conclusion: The present study has demonstrated a higher level of surface enamel dissolution in the experimental group. There is a marked difference in the VHN between the control and experimental groups, which is statistically significant. The scanning electron microscopy study also confirms the presence of surface enamel demineralization following orthodontic bonding. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a decalcification 
690 |a enamel microhardness 
690 |a fixed orthodontic appliance 
690 |a microhardness 
690 |a white spot 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
690 |a Analytical chemistry 
690 |a QD71-142 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences, Vol 13, Iss 6, Pp 1106-1110 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.jpbsonline.org/article.asp?issn=0975-7406;year=2021;volume=13;issue=6;spage=1106;epage=1110;aulast=Rajendran 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0975-7406 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/86f1b9ab0f8e471e9403e2bd29a41c1a  |z Connect to this object online.