Quantitative Systems Pharmacology for Neuroscience Drug Discovery and Development: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges

The substantial progress made in the basic sciences of the brain has yet to be adequately translated to successful clinical therapeutics to treat central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Possible explanations include the lack of quantitative and validated biomarkers, the subjective nature of many clin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hugo Geerts (Author), John Wikswo (Author), Piet H. van derGraaf (Author), Jane P.F. Bai (Author), Chris Gaiteri (Author), David Bennett (Author), Susanne E. Swalley (Author), Edgar Schuck (Author), Rima Kaddurah‐Daouk (Author), Katya Tsaioun (Author), Mary Pelleymounter (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wiley, 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8a1dd381fae0453582f85ba6ffbca2d2
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Hugo Geerts  |e author 
700 1 0 |a John Wikswo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Piet H. van derGraaf  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Jane P.F. Bai  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chris Gaiteri  |e author 
700 1 0 |a David Bennett  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susanne E. Swalley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Edgar Schuck  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rima Kaddurah‐Daouk  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Katya Tsaioun  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mary Pelleymounter  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology for Neuroscience Drug Discovery and Development: Current Status, Opportunities, and Challenges 
260 |b Wiley,   |c 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2163-8306 
500 |a 10.1002/psp4.12478 
520 |a The substantial progress made in the basic sciences of the brain has yet to be adequately translated to successful clinical therapeutics to treat central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Possible explanations include the lack of quantitative and validated biomarkers, the subjective nature of many clinical endpoints, and complex pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships, but also the possibility that highly selective drugs in the CNS do not reflect the complex interactions of different brain circuits. Although computational systems pharmacology modeling designed to capture essential components of complex biological systems has been increasingly accepted in pharmaceutical research and development for oncology, inflammation, and metabolic disorders, the uptake in the CNS field has been very modest. In this article, a cross‐disciplinary group with representatives from academia, pharma, regulatory, and funding agencies make the case that the identification and exploitation of CNS therapeutic targets for drug discovery and development can benefit greatly from a system and network approach that can span the gap between molecular pathways and the neuronal circuits that ultimately regulate brain activity and behavior. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), convened a workshop to explore and evaluate the potential of a quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) approach to CNS drug discovery and development. The objective of the workshop was to identify the challenges and opportunities of QSP as an approach to accelerate drug discovery and development in the field of CNS disorders. In particular, the workshop examined the potential for computational neuroscience to perform QSP‐based interrogation of the mechanism of action for CNS diseases, along with a more accurate and comprehensive method for evaluating drug effects and optimizing the design of clinical trials. Following up on an earlier white paper on the use of QSP in general disease mechanism of action and drug discovery, this report focuses on new applications, opportunities, and the accompanying limitations of QSP as an approach to drug development in the CNS therapeutic area based on the discussions in the workshop with various stakeholders. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Vol 9, Iss 1, Pp 5-20 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.12478 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2163-8306 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8a1dd381fae0453582f85ba6ffbca2d2  |z Connect to this object online.