Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone

The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marcela Filié Haddad (Author), Marcelo Coelho Goiato (Author), Daniela Micheline dos Santos (Author), Nádia de Marchi Crepaldi (Author), Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira (Author), Lisiane Cristina Bannwart (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of São Paulo, 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8a58761c61b64b82ae97451047fc47f1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Marcela Filié Haddad  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marcelo Coelho Goiato  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Daniela Micheline dos Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Nádia de Marchi Crepaldi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lisiane Cristina Bannwart  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Bond strength between acrylic resin and maxillofacial silicone 
260 |b University of São Paulo,   |c 2012-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1678-7765 
500 |a 10.1590/S1678-77572012000600010 
520 |a The development of implant dentistry improved the possibilities of rehabilitation with maxillofacial prosthesis. However, clinically it is difficult to bond the silicone to the attachment system. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an adhesive system on the bond strength between acrylic resin and facial silicone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 samples were fabricated with auto-polymerized acrylic resin and MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. Both materials were bonded through mechanical retentions and/or application of primers (DC 1205 primer and Sofreliner primer S) and adhesive (Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A) or not (control group). Samples were divided into 12 groups according to the method used to attach the silicone to the acrylic resin. All samples were subjected to a T-peel test in a universal testing machine. Failures were classified as adhesive, cohesive or mixed. The data were evaluated by the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey's HSD test (α=.05). RESULTS: The highest bond strength values (5.95 N/mm; 3.07 N/mm; 4.75 N/mm) were recorded for the samples that received a Sofreliner primer application. These values were significantly higher when the samples had no scratches and did not receive the application of Silastic Medical Adhesive Type A. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of failure was adhesive. The use of Sofreliner primer increased the bond strength between the auto-polymerized acrylic resin and the Silastic MDX 4-4210 facial silicone. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Silicone elastomers 
690 |a Acrylic resins 
690 |a Polymethyl methacrylate 
690 |a Dental implantation 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 20, Iss 6, Pp 649-654 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572012000600010&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8a58761c61b64b82ae97451047fc47f1  |z Connect to this object online.