Development of Learning Cycle 5E-Based Teaching Tools to Facilitate Students' Conceptual Changes in Mathematics Learning

This article describes the results of developing Learning Cycle 5E teaching tools that are valid, practical, and effective to facilitate students' conceptual changes in Statistics and Data Presentation material. The Four-D model was used to develop this research. The quality of the product is m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ega Gradini (Author), Susanti Susanti (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Universitas Jambi, 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8a784859d7c04a7c8f562d5259e71ab1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ega Gradini  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susanti Susanti  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Development of Learning Cycle 5E-Based Teaching Tools to Facilitate Students' Conceptual Changes in Mathematics Learning 
260 |b Universitas Jambi,   |c 2022-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.22437/edumatica.v12i02.16933 
500 |a 2088-2157 
500 |a 2580-0779 
520 |a This article describes the results of developing Learning Cycle 5E teaching tools that are valid, practical, and effective to facilitate students' conceptual changes in Statistics and Data Presentation material. The Four-D model was used to develop this research. The quality of the product is measured through the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of teaching tools. The device's validity is measured by its relevance and consistency using expert judgment. The device's practicality was measured using a practicality assessment questionnaire, distributed to 5 Mathematics teachers and 20 eighth-grader. Effectiveness was measured through a small group trial involving 1 Mathematics teacher and 28 eighth-grader students. The results showed that the teaching tools developed met the validity, practicality, and effectiveness criteria. Learning tools are declared valid, with the validity score for lesson plans being 0.89, student worksheets being 0.86, teacher book being 0.78, and student book being 0.80. Learning tools are declared practical with a practicality score where the teacher's response is 80.31% in the practical category, and the student's response is 79.19% in the practical category. Furthermore, teaching tools were declared effective with the criteria; the classical average of student learning outcomes reached 83.71, the Learning Completeness Criteria reached 82.14%, the level of teacher learning management was at a Good level, and student activity reached 72.5%. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a ID 
690 |a conceptual change 
690 |a learning cycle 
690 |a conceptual understanding 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Education (General) 
690 |a L7-991 
690 |a Mathematics 
690 |a QA1-939 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 12, Iss 02 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/edumatica/article/view/16933 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2088-2157 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2580-0779 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8a784859d7c04a7c8f562d5259e71ab1  |z Connect to this object online.