Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses

Abstract Background The time that nurses spent on documentation can be substantial and burdensome. To date it was unknown if documentation activities are related to the workload that nurses perceive. A distinction between clinical documentation and organizational documentation seems relevant. This s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim De Groot (Author), Anke J. E. De Veer (Author), Anne M. Munster (Author), Anneke L. Francke (Author), Wolter Paans (Author)
Format: Book
Published: BMC, 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8a7be8d26e8044c48fc2a56fae4faedc
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kim De Groot  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anke J. E. De Veer  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anne M. Munster  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Anneke L. Francke  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wolter Paans  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Nursing documentation and its relationship with perceived nursing workload: a mixed-methods study among community nurses 
260 |b BMC,   |c 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1186/s12912-022-00811-7 
500 |a 1472-6955 
520 |a Abstract Background The time that nurses spent on documentation can be substantial and burdensome. To date it was unknown if documentation activities are related to the workload that nurses perceive. A distinction between clinical documentation and organizational documentation seems relevant. This study aims to gain insight into community nurses' views on a potential relationship between their clinical and organizational documentation activities and their perceived nursing workload. Methods A convergent mixed-methods design was used. A quantitative survey was completed by 195 Dutch community nurses and a further 28 community nurses participated in qualitative focus groups. For the survey an online questionnaire was used. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-ranked tests, Spearman's rank correlations and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyse the survey data. Next, four qualitative focus groups were conducted in an iterative process of data collection - data analysis - more data collection, until data saturation was reached. In the qualitative analysis, the six steps of thematic analysis were followed. Results The majority of the community nurses perceived a high workload due to documentation activities. Although survey data showed that nurses estimated that they spent twice as much time on clinical documentation as on organizational documentation, the workload they perceived from these two types of documentation was comparable. Focus-group participants found organizational documentation particularly redundant. Furthermore, the survey indicated that a perceived high workload was not related to actual time spent on clinical documentation, while actual time spent on organizational documentation was related to the perceived workload. In addition, the survey showed no associations between community nurses' perceived workload and the user-friendliness of electronic health records. Yet focus-group participants did point towards the impact of limited user-friendliness on their perceived workload. Lastly, there was no association between the perceived workload and whether the nursing process was central in the electronic health records. Conclusions Community nurses often perceive a high workload due to clinical and organizational documentation activities. Decreasing the time nurses have to spend specifically on organizational documentation and improving the user-friendliness and intercommunicability of electronic health records appear to be important ways of reducing the workload that community nurses perceive. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Documentation burden 
690 |a Electronic health record 
690 |a Home care 
690 |a Mixed-methods research 
690 |a Nursing documentation 
690 |a Nursing process 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n BMC Nursing, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00811-7 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1472-6955 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8a7be8d26e8044c48fc2a56fae4faedc  |z Connect to this object online.