COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL SURFACE TENSION AND CAPILLARITY OF MAXILLARY COMPLETE DENTURES, FABRICATED BY CONVENTIONAL CUVETTE TECHNIQUE AND INJECTION MOLDING TECHNOLOGY

Purpose: The purpose of this in vivo study is to register the forces necessary to displace maxillary complete dentures fabricated by compression molding and injection molding techniques on one and the same patient and to compare the interfacial surface tension and capillarity which are achieved by b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kalina Georgieva (Author), Metodi Abadjiev (Author), Georgi Kostadinov (Author), Kiril Gogushev (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Peytchinski Publishing, 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8a9b1a8db2ff420d88e26a99a42a217a
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kalina Georgieva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Metodi Abadjiev  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Georgi Kostadinov  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kiril Gogushev  |e author 
245 0 0 |a COMPARISON OF INTERFACIAL SURFACE TENSION AND CAPILLARITY OF MAXILLARY COMPLETE DENTURES, FABRICATED BY CONVENTIONAL CUVETTE TECHNIQUE AND INJECTION MOLDING TECHNOLOGY 
260 |b Peytchinski Publishing,   |c 2016-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.5272/jimab.2016223.1296 
500 |a 1312-773X 
520 |a Purpose: The purpose of this in vivo study is to register the forces necessary to displace maxillary complete dentures fabricated by compression molding and injection molding techniques on one and the same patient and to compare the interfacial surface tension and capillarity which are achieved by both techniques. Material/Methods: Two maxillary complete dentures are made for each patient (total number of patients is 30) using both technologies. The magnitude of dislodging force is measured by a dynamometer. Results: Mean ± standard deviation for conventional cuvette technique is 17,53N ± 12,11N. Mean ± standard deviation for injection molding technique is 20,73N ± 13,89N. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed statistically significant differences in results achieved by conventional cuvette technique and injection molding technology. The results of injection technique were higher than those of compression molding technique (F=123,676, p< 0,001). Conclusions: Based on the results we suggest a standard for dislodging force of maxillary complete dentures fabricated by conventional cuvette technique- 13N, and by injection molding technology-15,5N. These values would guarantee good interfacial surface tension and capillarity. The injection molding technique was found to produce better fitting maxillary complete dentures when compared to compression molding technique. This would ensure better retention, less traumatic manifestations after insertion and higher patient's comfort and satisfaction. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a surface tension 
690 |a capillarity 
690 |a dentures 
690 |a cuvette technique 
690 |a injection molding 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
690 |a Medicine (General) 
690 |a R5-920 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of IMAB, Vol 22, Iss 3, Pp 1296-1300 (2016) 
787 0 |n http://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2016/issue3/JofIMAB-2016-22-3p1296-1300.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1312-773X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8a9b1a8db2ff420d88e26a99a42a217a  |z Connect to this object online.