Improving the capabilities of NHS organisations to use evidence: a qualitative study of redesign projects in Clinical Commissioning Groups
Background: Innovation driven by authoritative evidence is critical to the survival of England's NHS. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) are central in NHS efforts to do more with less. Although decisions should be based on the 'best available evidence', this is often problematic, w...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Jacqueline Swan (Author), Emmanouil Gkeredakis (Author), Rachel M Manning (Author), Davide Nicolini (Author), David Sharp (Author), John Powell (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
National Institute for Health Research,
2017-05-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
What Resources Do NHS Commissioning Organisations Use to Support Antimicrobial Stewardship in Primary Care in England?
by: Rosalie Allison, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Consequences of how third sector organisations are commissioned in the NHS and local authorities in England: a mixed-methods study
by: Rod Sheaff, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Keeping knowledgeable: how NHS chief executive officers mobilise knowledge and information in their daily work
by: Davide Nicolini, et al.
Published: (2014) -
Clinical leadership in service redesign using Clinical Commissioning Groups: a mixed-methods study
by: John Storey, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Investigating the nature and quality of locally commissioned evaluations of the NHS Vanguard programme: an evidence synthesis
by: Paul Wilson, et al.
Published: (2021)