Developing a national accreditation model via Delphi Technique

Background: Accreditation is one of the evaluation systems which have numerous effects on the key indicators in health care system. To develop a suitable accreditation model, a best way could be the benchmark of the powerful and successful accreditation models in all over the world. By considering l...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J Sadeq Tabrizi (Author), F Gharibi (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2012-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8b47ffb36dfe4a0a8a353c4e3ae9fe4f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a J Sadeq Tabrizi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a F Gharibi  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Developing a national accreditation model via Delphi Technique 
260 |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2012-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2008-1928 
500 |a 2228-7450 
520 |a Background: Accreditation is one of the evaluation systems which have numerous effects on the key indicators in health care system. To develop a suitable accreditation model, a best way could be the benchmark of the powerful and successful accreditation models in all over the world. By considering likely differences in the various countries health systems, this study aims to survey the compatibility of the best accreditation models and standards in Islamic Republic of Iran's health care system.Materials & Methods: In this study, the expert's perspectives have been ascertained about standards of selected references accreditation models based on standards "importance" and "feasibility" using two rounds Delphi Technique. The experts selected among scientific and academic experts in the areas of accreditation and health services management. They were asked to fill up the Delphi questionnaire and send back it to the researchers in the designated time. Each standard scored in Likert scale from 1 to 9. Standards with mean score of ≤ 3 were rejected, standards with mean score between 4 and 6 send to the second round and standards with mean score ≥ 7 included in the national model. Results: In the first round, 20 out of 27 questionnaires have been obtained from experts. After data analyses all the standards have been accepted except 31 with mean score between 4 and 6. Remained 31 standards with achieved mean scores in first round, send back to the study experts through the second round. In the second round, 17 out of 20 questionnaires collected and finally 18 standards were rejected.Conclusion: According to the variety of standards, comprehensive categories and richness of necessary details of standards, the resulted model in this study could be a rich and suitable model for Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore, using this model could empower evaluation system and improve the quality of health care system. 
546 |a FA 
690 |a accreditation 
690 |a standards 
690 |a delphi technique 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n بیمارستان, Vol 11, Iss 2, Pp 9-18 (2012) 
787 0 |n http://jhosp.tums.ac.ir/article-1-25-en.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2008-1928 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2228-7450 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8b47ffb36dfe4a0a8a353c4e3ae9fe4f  |z Connect to this object online.