Relationship between false positive screening results of down syndrome and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Background: Maternal serum sample screening in the first and second trimesters has been commonly used to identify women who are at risk of fetal trisomy 21. In addition, these serum markers are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Hence, the present study was conducted to determine the relati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maryam Honarjoo (Author), Shahnaz Kohan (Author), Mohammad Javad Tarrahi (Author), Elahe Zarean (Author), Soheila Sepahi (Author), Zeinab Safari (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8b849e3291d84d6a8e38f774545827a6
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Maryam Honarjoo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shahnaz Kohan  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mohammad Javad Tarrahi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elahe Zarean  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Soheila Sepahi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zeinab Safari  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Relationship between false positive screening results of down syndrome and adverse pregnancy outcomes 
260 |b Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications,   |c 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1735-9066 
500 |a 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_259_21 
520 |a Background: Maternal serum sample screening in the first and second trimesters has been commonly used to identify women who are at risk of fetal trisomy 21. In addition, these serum markers are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Hence, the present study was conducted to determine the relationship between false positive screening results of Down syndrome and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Material and Methods: This prospective, two-group, cohort study was conducted on 608 pregnant women who had undergone fetal contingent screening. They were selected through convenience sampling in the twentieth week of pregnancy and were followed up until delivery. The raw Odd Ratios (OR), Relative Risk (RR), and adjusted OR of adverse pregnancy outcomes were calculated in the false positive and true negative groups. Results: The adjusted OR of developing preeclampsia was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.14-3.42), and its RR was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.34-3.38) times higher in the false positive group. Moreover, the adjusted OR of Small for Gestational Age (SGA) was 2.80 (95% CI: 1.76-4.47), and its RR was 2.28 (95% CI: 1.54-3.36) times higher in the false positive group. The adjusted OR of Low Birth Weight (LBW) was 3.34 (95% CI: 1.97-5.64), and its RR was 2.65 (95% CI: 1.72-4.11) times higher in the false positive group. In addition, no significant difference was observed between false positive and true negative groups in terms of preterm birth. Conclusions: Women with a false positive fetal screening test result are more likely to suffer from preeclampsia, SGA, and LBW and require planned prenatal care. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a adverse pregnancy outcomes 
690 |a down syndrome screening 
690 |a low birth weight 
690 |a small for gestational age 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, Vol 28, Iss 4, Pp 443-447 (2023) 
787 0 |n http://www.ijnmrjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-9066;year=2023;volume=28;issue=4;spage=443;epage=447;aulast=Honarjoo 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1735-9066 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8b849e3291d84d6a8e38f774545827a6  |z Connect to this object online.