Standards of teeth preparations for anterior resin bonded all-ceramic crowns in private dental practice in Jordan
OBJECTIVES: To investigate if general dental practitioners (GDPs) in private practice in Jordan follow universal guidelines for preparation of anterior teeth for resin bonded all-ceramic crowns (RBCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample (n=100) of laboratory models containing 208 tooth preparations for...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
University of São Paulo,
2011-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_8b9adb7815874356b78c78f0cedab9d8 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Ziad Nawaf AL-Dwairi |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Ahmad Saleh AL-Hiyasat |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Haitham Aboud |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Standards of teeth preparations for anterior resin bonded all-ceramic crowns in private dental practice in Jordan |
260 | |b University of São Paulo, |c 2011-08-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1678-7765 | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To investigate if general dental practitioners (GDPs) in private practice in Jordan follow universal guidelines for preparation of anterior teeth for resin bonded all-ceramic crowns (RBCs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A sample (n=100) of laboratory models containing 208 tooth preparations for IPS Empress and In Ceram, featuring work from different GDPs, was obtained from 8 commercial dental laboratories. Aspects of preparations were quantified and compared with accepted criteria defined following a review of the literature and recommendations of the manufactures' guidelines. RESULTS: Subgingival margins on the buccal aspect were noticed in 36% of the preparations, 54% demonstrated overpreparation with a tendency to overprepare the teeth on the mesiodistal plane more than buccolingual plane. Twenty percent of samples presented a shoulder finish line while a chamfer margin design was noticed in 39%. Twenty-nine percent and 12% of samples had either a feathered or no clear margin design respectively. Incisal underpreparation was observed in 18% of dies of each type. Only 17% of all preparations were found to follow the recommended anatomical labial preparations while 29% of the RBC preparations were found to have the recommended axial convergence angle. In total, 43% of preparations were found to have the recommended depth of the finish line. CONCLUSIONS: It was found that relevant guidelines for RBC preparations were not being fully adhered to in private practice in Jordan. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a Porcelain | ||
690 | |a Anterior teeth | ||
690 | |a In-ceram | ||
690 | |a Jordan | ||
690 | |a Private practice | ||
690 | |a Dentistry | ||
690 | |a RK1-715 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 19, Iss 4, Pp 370-377 (2011) | |
787 | 0 | |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572011000400013&lng=en&tlng=en | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/8b9adb7815874356b78c78f0cedab9d8 |z Connect to this object online. |