Does Physical Activity in Natural Outdoor Environments Improve Wellbeing? A Meta-Analysis

Organizational initiatives and researchers have argued for the importance of the natural outdoor environment (NOE) for promoting wellbeing. The main aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the existing literature to examine the effects of physical activity (PA) in the NOE on wellbeing in adults....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Caitlin Kelley (Author), Diane E. Mack (Author), Philip M. Wilson (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8b9ccd748d9d413b82cef20f190f6c19
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Caitlin Kelley  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Diane E. Mack  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Philip M. Wilson  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Does Physical Activity in Natural Outdoor Environments Improve Wellbeing? A Meta-Analysis 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2022-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/sports10070103 
500 |a 2075-4663 
520 |a Organizational initiatives and researchers have argued for the importance of the natural outdoor environment (NOE) for promoting wellbeing. The main aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the existing literature to examine the effects of physical activity (PA) in the NOE on wellbeing in adults. The secondary aim was to explore whether wellbeing reported by adults differs as a function of PA context. Electronic databases (PubMed, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus and Embase) were searched for English peer-reviewed articles published before January 2019. Inclusion criteria were: (1) healthy adults; (2) PA in the NOE; (3) the measurement of wellbeing; and (4) randomized control trials, quasi-experimental designs, matched group designs. To address the secondary aim, PA in the NOE was compared with that performed indoors. Risk of bias was assessed through the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Primary studies meeting inclusion criteria for the main (<i>n</i><i><sub>studies</sub></i> = 19) and secondary (<i>n</i><i><sub>studies</sub></i> = 5) aims were analyzed and interpreted. The overall effect size for the main analysis was moderate (<i>d</i> = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001; <i>95% CI</i> = 0.33, 0.66), with the magnitude of effect varying depending on wellbeing dimension. Wellbeing was greater in PA in the NOE subgroup (<i>d</i> = 0.53) when compared with the indoor subgroup (<i>d</i> = 0.28), albeit not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.15). Although physical activity in the NOE was associated with higher wellbeing, there is limited evidence to support that it confers superior benefits to that engaged indoors. Researchers are encouraged to include study designs that measure markers of wellbeing at multiple time points, greater consideration to diverse wellbeing dimensions and justify decisions linked to PA and NOE types. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a mental health 
690 |a green exercise 
690 |a health promotion 
690 |a nature 
690 |a restoration 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Sports, Vol 10, Iss 7, p 103 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/10/7/103 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4663 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8b9ccd748d9d413b82cef20f190f6c19  |z Connect to this object online.