Mis-sizing of Adenomatous Polyps is Common among Endoscopists and Impacts Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations

Background/Aims To determine the accuracy of identifying ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy and define its impact on subsequent interval screening. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent colonoscopies at Banner University Medical Center, Tucson from 2011 to 201...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thu Pham (Author), Aung Bajaj (Author), Lorela Berberi (Author), Chengcheng Hu (Author), Sasha Taleban (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8bff6a3b4cdd4ce5a76f8517a36a932b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Thu Pham  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aung Bajaj  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lorela Berberi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chengcheng Hu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sasha Taleban  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Mis-sizing of Adenomatous Polyps is Common among Endoscopists and Impacts Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations 
260 |b Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,   |c 2018-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2234-2400 
500 |a 2234-2443 
500 |a 10.5946/ce.2017.183 
520 |a Background/Aims To determine the accuracy of identifying ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps during colonoscopy and define its impact on subsequent interval screening. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent colonoscopies at Banner University Medical Center, Tucson from 2011 to 2015. All patients with ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps based on their colonoscopy report were included. Adenomatous polyps were excluded if they did not meet the criteria. Discrepancies in the polyp size were determined by calculating the percentage of size variation (SV). Clinical mis-sizing was defined as SV >33%. Results The polyps analyzed were predominantly <10 mm in size. Approximately 13% of the examined polyps met the inclusion criteria, and 40.7% of the adenomas were ≥10 mm. A total of 189 ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps were collected from 10 different gastroenterologists and a colorectal surgeon. Adenomatous polyps were clinically mis-sized in 56.6% of cases and overestimated in 71.4%. Among the adenomas reviewed, 22% of mis-sized polyps and 11% of non-mis-sized polyps resulted in an inappropriate surveillance interval. Conclusions We found that more than half of ≥6-mm adenomatous polyps are mis-sized and that there is a tendency to overestimate adenoma size among endoscopists. This frequently leads to inappropriate intervals of surveillance colonoscopy. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Polyp size 
690 |a Endoscopist estimate 
690 |a Adenomatous polyps 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
690 |a Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology 
690 |a RC799-869 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Clinical Endoscopy, Vol 51, Iss 5, Pp 485-490 (2018) 
787 0 |n http://www.e-ce.org/upload/pdf/ce-2017-183.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2234-2400 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2234-2443 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8bff6a3b4cdd4ce5a76f8517a36a932b  |z Connect to this object online.