Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Bone Loss

Objectives: Bone assessment is essential for diagnosis, treatment planning and prediction of prognosis of periodontal diseases. However, two-dimensional radiographic techniques have multiple limitations, mainly addressed by the introduction of three-dimensional imaging techniques such as cone beam c...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors: Daryoush Goodarzi Pour (Author), Elham Romoozi (Author), Yadollah Soleimani Shayesteh (Author)
Formato: Livro
Publicado em: Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2016-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8c4dcc9720aa46ffbe26a7ebf73e0f36
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Daryoush Goodarzi Pour  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elham Romoozi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yadollah Soleimani Shayesteh  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Detection of Bone Loss 
260 |b Tehran University of Medical Sciences,   |c 2016-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2676-296X 
520 |a Objectives: Bone assessment is essential for diagnosis, treatment planning and prediction of prognosis of periodontal diseases. However, two-dimensional radiographic techniques have multiple limitations, mainly addressed by the introduction of three-dimensional imaging techniques such as cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CBCT for detection of marginal bone loss in patients receiving dental implants. Materials and Methods: A study of diagnostic test accuracy was designed and 38 teeth from candidates for dental implant treatment were selected. On CBCT scans, the amount of bone resorption in the buccal, lingual/palatal, mesial and distal surfaces was determined by measuring the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the alveolar crest (normal group: 0-1.5mm, mild bone loss: 1.6-3mm, moderate bone loss: 3.1-4.5mm and severe bone loss: >4.5mm). During the surgical phase, bone loss was measured at the same sites using a periodontal probe. The values were then compared by McNemar's test. Results: In the buccal, lingual/palatal, mesial and distal surfaces, no significant difference was observed between the values obtained using CBCT and the surgical method. The correlation between CBCT and surgical method was mainly based on the estimation of the degree of bone resorption. CBCT was capable of showing various levels of resorption in all surfaces with high sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value compared to the surgical method. Conclusion: CBCT enables accurate measurement of bone loss comparable to surgical exploration and can be used for diagnosis of bone defects in periodontal diseases in clinical settings. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Bone Resorption 
690 |a Cone Beam Computed Tomography 
690 |a Periodontal Diseases 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Dentistry, Vol 12, Iss 7 (2016) 
787 0 |n https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/996 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2676-296X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8c4dcc9720aa46ffbe26a7ebf73e0f36  |z Connect to this object online.