Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material

Aims: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of a hard chairsidereline material to denture base resin. Materials and methods: Cylindric columns of denture reline materialwere bonded to columns of denture base resin. Fifty specimens were prepared and divide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radhwan H Hasan (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry, 2009-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8c72ab8374584b6fb94a8e6e1b2f354b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Radhwan H Hasan  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Shear Bond Strength of Hard Chairside Reline Material to Denture Base Material 
260 |b University of Mosul, College of Dentistry,   |c 2009-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.33899/rden.2009.9110 
500 |a 1812-1217 
500 |a 1998-0345 
520 |a Aims: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatment on shear bond strength (SBS) of a hard chairsidereline material to denture base resin. Materials and methods: Cylindric columns of denture reline materialwere bonded to columns of denture base resin. Fifty specimens were prepared and divided into 5 groupsaccording to the surface treatment used. Group I: Untreated; group II: Wetting with denture base resin monomer(180 s); group III: Wetting with Kooliner monomer (180 s); group IV: Wetting with acetone (10 s);and group V: Wetting with chloroform (5 s). The strength at which the bond failed under shear was recordedand fracture site on the specimens was tested by visual examination and reflecting light microscope. Thedata were statistically analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Duncan's Multiple RangeTest and Chi-square test. Results: All surface treatments caused significantly increase (p < 0.0001) in SBS.Chloroform caused significantly higher SBS, and untreated group showed significantly lower SBS. Mixedfailure mode was predominant in groups with higher SBS, while adhesive failure mode was predominant ingroups with lower SBS. Conclusions: All surface treatments (Monomer, Kooliner monomer, acetone, chloroform)achieved significantly higher SBS. 
546 |a AR 
546 |a EN 
690 |a shear strength 
690 |a reline resin 
690 |a denture base resin 
690 |a bond strength 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Al-Rafidain Dental Journal, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 203-210 (2009) 
787 0 |n https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_9110_647195c2f7e5143a90973701ed43f5e0.html 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1812-1217 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1998-0345 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8c72ab8374584b6fb94a8e6e1b2f354b  |z Connect to this object online.