Peak Power Output Is Similarly Recovered After Three- and Five-Days' Rest Following Sprint Interval Training in Young and Older Adults

(1) Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) exerts effects indicative of improved health in young and older populations. However, prescribing analogous training programmes is inappropriate, as recovery from HIIT is different between young and older individuals. Sprint interval training (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zerbu Yasar (Author), Susan Dewhurst (Author), Lawrence D. Hayes (Author)
Format: Book
Published: MDPI AG, 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8c847f074be84968870540f55bb5fd0c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Zerbu Yasar  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Susan Dewhurst  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lawrence D. Hayes  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Peak Power Output Is Similarly Recovered After Three- and Five-Days' Rest Following Sprint Interval Training in Young and Older Adults 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2019-04-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2075-4663 
500 |a 10.3390/sports7040094 
520 |a (1) Background: High-intensity interval training (HIIT) exerts effects indicative of improved health in young and older populations. However, prescribing analogous training programmes is inappropriate, as recovery from HIIT is different between young and older individuals. Sprint interval training (SIT) is a derivative of HIIT but with shorter, maximal effort intervals. Prior to prescribing this mode of training, it is imperative to understand the recovery period to prevent residual fatigue affecting subsequent adaptations. (2) Methods: Nine older (6M/3F; mean age of 70 &#177; 8 years) and nine young (6M/3F; mean age of 24 &#177; 3 years) participants performed a baseline peak power output (PPO) test. Subsequently, two SIT sessions consisting of three repetitions of 20 s &#8216;all-out&#8217; stationary cycling bouts interspersed by 3 minutes of self-paced recovery were performed. SIT sessions were followed by 3 days&#8217; rest and 5 days&#8217; rest on two separate occasions, in a randomised crossover design. PPO was measured again to determine whether recovery had been achieved after 3 days or after 5 days. (3) Results: Two-way repeated measure (age (older, young) &#215; 3 time (baseline, 3 days, 5 days)) ANOVA revealed a large effect of age (<i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>n<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub></i> = 0.460), with older participants having a lower PPO compared to young participants. A small effect of time (<i>p</i> = 0.702, <i>n<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub></i> = 0.022), and a medium interaction between age and time (<i>p</i> = 0.098, <i>n<sup>2</sup><sub>p</sub></i> = 0.135) was observed. (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrates both young and older adults recover PPO following 3 and 5 days&#8217; rest. As such, both groups could undertake SIT following three days of rest, without a reduction in PPO. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a high-intensity interval training 
690 |a maximal 
690 |a older adults 
690 |a peak power output 
690 |a recovery 
690 |a sprint interval training 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Sports, Vol 7, Iss 4, p 94 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4663/7/4/94 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2075-4663 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8c847f074be84968870540f55bb5fd0c  |z Connect to this object online.