Obstetrical outcome valuations by patients, professionals, and laypersons: differences within and between groups using three valuation methods
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Decision-making can be based on treatment preferences of the patient, the doctor, or by guidelines based on lay people's preferences. We compared valuations assigned by three groups: patients, obstetrical care professionals, and...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Bijlenga Denise (Author), Birnie Erwin (Author), Mol Ben WJ (Author), Bonsel Gouke J (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2011-11-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
When outcome is a balance: methods to measure combined utility for the choice between induction of labour and expectant management in mild risk pregnancy at term
by: Mol Ben WJ, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Individual differences in the use of the response scale determine valuations of hypothetical health states: an empirical study
by: Meerding Willem-Jan, et al.
Published: (2007) -
VALUATION AND VISIBILITY OF NURSING
by: Maria Ribeiro Lacerda
Published: (2018) -
Rationality Concepts in Environmental Valuation
by: Frör, Oliver
Published: (2018) -
Rationality Concepts in Environmental Valuation
by: Frör, Oliver
Published: (2018)