A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for the Waiver of In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Products in Certain Dosage Forms by Participating Regulators and Organisations of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme

The requirements to waive in vivo bioequivalence studies for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classifications System (BCS) are well known, and biowaivers[1] for other types of oral dosage forms based on pre-defined criteria may also be acceptable. Similarly, bi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alfredo Garcia Arieta (Author), Craig Simon (Author), Andrew Tam (Author), Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos (Author), Eduardo Agostinho Freitas Fernandes (Author), Zulema Rodríguez Martínez (Author), Clare Rodrigues (Author), Sang Aeh Park (Author), JaYoung Kim (Author), Kwansoo Kim (Author), Ryosuke Kuribayashi (Author), Aya Myoenzono (Author), Kohei Shimojo (Author), Chantal Walther (Author), Matthias S. Roost (Author), Wen-Yi Hung (Author), Li-feng Hsu (Author), Christopher Crane (Author), April C. Braddy (Author), Joy van Oudtshoorn (Author), Diego Alejandro Gutierrez Triana (Author), Erwin Guzmán Aurela (Author), Ben Jones (Author), Henrike Potthast (Author), Ivana Abalos (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8d2cf13caf2d41e48ba25b6cfa407f3b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Alfredo Garcia Arieta  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Craig Simon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Andrew Tam  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eduardo Agostinho Freitas Fernandes  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Zulema Rodríguez Martínez  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Clare Rodrigues  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sang Aeh Park  |e author 
700 1 0 |a JaYoung Kim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kwansoo Kim  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ryosuke Kuribayashi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aya Myoenzono  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Kohei Shimojo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chantal Walther  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Matthias S. Roost  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wen-Yi Hung  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Li-feng Hsu  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Christopher Crane  |e author 
700 1 0 |a April C. Braddy  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joy van Oudtshoorn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Diego Alejandro Gutierrez Triana  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Erwin Guzmán Aurela  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ben Jones  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Henrike Potthast  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ivana Abalos  |e author 
245 0 0 |a A Survey of the Regulatory Requirements for the Waiver of In Vivo Bioequivalence Studies of Generic Products in Certain Dosage Forms by Participating Regulators and Organisations of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2021-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.18433/jpps31491 
500 |a 1482-1826 
520 |a The requirements to waive in vivo bioequivalence studies for immediate release solid oral dosage forms based on the Biopharmaceutics Classifications System (BCS) are well known, and biowaivers[1] for other types of oral dosage forms based on pre-defined criteria may also be acceptable. Similarly, biowaivers for dosage forms such as injectable products may also be allowed if certain criteria are met. The current paper summarises the biowaiver requirements for oral solutions and suspensions, soft gelatin capsules and injectable products (intravenous injections, subcutaneous and intramuscular injections, emulsions for injection and micellar solutions for injection) among the participants of the Bioequivalence Working Group for Generics (BEWGG) of the International Pharmaceutical Regulators Programme (IPRP). A review of the requirements indicated that there was a trend towards convergence when the dosage form became less complex; however, the most common approach used by each of the jurisdictions was a case-by-case approach given that most jurisdictions do not have well defined guidelines to support all possible scenarios. Even in the simplest case of intravenous solutions, the acceptability of qualitative changes in excipients differ between the IPRP members.  Notwithstanding the differences, the dissemination of the information is a first step towards regulatory convergence regarding biowaivers for certain dosage forms and should be useful for pharmaceutical companies currently developing generic medicinal products for IPRP jurisdictions. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Therapeutics. Pharmacology 
690 |a RM1-950 
690 |a Pharmacy and materia medica 
690 |a RS1-441 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vol 24 (2021) 
787 0 |n https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/jpps/index.php/JPPS/article/view/31491 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1482-1826 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8d2cf13caf2d41e48ba25b6cfa407f3b  |z Connect to this object online.