Estimating undetected Ebola spillovers.

The preparedness of health systems to detect, treat, and prevent onward transmission of Ebola virus disease (EVD) is central to mitigating future outbreaks. Early detection of outbreaks is critical to timely response, but estimating detection rates is difficult because unreported spillover events an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma E Glennon (Author), Freya L Jephcott (Author), Olivier Restif (Author), James L N Wood (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8d4dc27205e24780bd0abbe14dce1d0c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Emma E Glennon  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Freya L Jephcott  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Olivier Restif  |e author 
700 1 0 |a James L N Wood  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Estimating undetected Ebola spillovers. 
260 |b Public Library of Science (PLoS),   |c 2019-06-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1935-2727 
500 |a 1935-2735 
500 |a 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007428 
520 |a The preparedness of health systems to detect, treat, and prevent onward transmission of Ebola virus disease (EVD) is central to mitigating future outbreaks. Early detection of outbreaks is critical to timely response, but estimating detection rates is difficult because unreported spillover events and outbreaks do not generate data. Using three independent datasets available on the distributions of secondary infections during EVD outbreaks across West Africa, in a single district (Western Area) of Sierra Leone, and in the city of Conakry, Guinea, we simulated realistic outbreak size distributions and compared them to reported outbreak sizes. These three empirical distributions lead to estimates for the proportion of detected spillover events and small outbreaks of 26% (range 8-40%, based on the full outbreak data), 48% (range 39-62%, based on the Sierra Leone data), and 17% (range 11-24%, based on the Guinea data). We conclude that at least half of all spillover events have failed to be reported since EVD was first recognized. We also estimate the probability of detecting outbreaks of different sizes, which is likely less than 10% for single-case spillover events. Comparing models of the observation process also suggests the probability of detecting an outbreak is not simply the cumulative probability of independently detecting any one individual. Rather, we find that any individual's probability of detection is highly dependent upon the size of the cluster of cases. These findings highlight the importance of primary health care and local case management to detect and contain undetected early stage outbreaks at source. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine 
690 |a RC955-962 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 13, Iss 6, p e0007428 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007428 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8d4dc27205e24780bd0abbe14dce1d0c  |z Connect to this object online.