Clinical Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing Restorations versus Composite Restorations in Dental Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations (IRR) vs. composite resin (CR) in dental restorations. Methods: A systematic search was carried out from articles published until January 2024, in the biomedical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Scopus, Web o...

Descrizione completa

Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega (Autore), Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva (Autore), Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate (Autore), Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia (Autore), Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga (Autore), Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza (Autore), Adriana Echevarria-Goche (Autore), Eduardo Luján-Urviola (Autore), Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock (Autore), Katherine Serquen-Olano (Autore), Carlos Alberto Farje-Gallardo (Autore)
Natura: Libro
Pubblicazione: MDPI AG, 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Soggetti:
Accesso online:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8d98fc9f02764f598d9d1e6a8468566c
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Heber Isac Arbildo-Vega  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Fredy Hugo Cruzado-Oliva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Franz Tito Coronel-Zubiate  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sara Antonieta Luján-Valencia  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joan Manuel Meza-Málaga  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rubén Aguirre-Ipenza  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Adriana Echevarria-Goche  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eduardo Luján-Urviola  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Tania Belú Castillo-Cornock  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Katherine Serquen-Olano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carlos Alberto Farje-Gallardo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Clinical Effectiveness of Ion-Releasing Restorations versus Composite Restorations in Dental Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 
260 |b MDPI AG,   |c 2024-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.3390/dj12060158 
500 |a 2304-6767 
520 |a Background: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ion-releasing restorations (IRR) vs. composite resin (CR) in dental restorations. Methods: A systematic search was carried out from articles published until January 2024, in the biomedical databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Randomized clinical trials were included, with a follow-up time greater than or equal to 1 year, without time and language limits and which reported the clinical effect of IRR compared to CR in dental restorations. The RoB 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies and the GRADEPro GDT tool was used to assess the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation of the results. Results: The search yielded a total of 1109 articles. After excluding those that did not meet the selection criteria, 29 articles remained for the quantitative synthesis. The analysis found no statistically significant difference when comparing the dental restorations with IRRs or CRs. Conclusion: The literature reviewed suggests that there are no differences between the IRRs and CRs in dental restorations. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a ion-releasing restoration 
690 |a composite resin 
690 |a glass ionomer cement 
690 |a review 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Dentistry Journal, Vol 12, Iss 6, p 158 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/12/6/158 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2304-6767 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8d98fc9f02764f598d9d1e6a8468566c  |z Connect to this object online.