Subjective image quality comparison between two digital dental radiographic systems and conventional dental film

Objectives: Digital radiography has become an integral part of dentistry. Digital radiography does not require film or dark rooms, reduces X-ray doses, and instantly generates images. The aim of our study was to compare the subjective image quality of two digital dental radiographic systems with con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammed Ajmal (Author), Mohamed I. Elshinawy (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8dc5f1c7fde247ad915a2f109cbc6b8f
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Muhammed Ajmal  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mohamed I. Elshinawy  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Subjective image quality comparison between two digital dental radiographic systems and conventional dental film 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2014-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1013-9052 
500 |a 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.05.007 
520 |a Objectives: Digital radiography has become an integral part of dentistry. Digital radiography does not require film or dark rooms, reduces X-ray doses, and instantly generates images. The aim of our study was to compare the subjective image quality of two digital dental radiographic systems with conventional dental film. Materials & methods: A direct digital (DD) 'Digital' system by Sirona, a semi-direct (SD) digital system by Vista-scan, and Kodak 'E' speed dental X-ray films were selected for the study. Endodontically-treated extracted teeth (n = 25) were used in the study. Details of enamel, dentin, dentino-enamel junction, root canal filling (gutta percha), and simulated apical pathology were investigated with the three radiographic systems. The data were subjected to statistical analyzes to reveal differences in subjective image quality. Results: Conventional dental X-ray film was superior to the digital systems. For digital systems, DD imaging was superior to SD imaging. Conclusion: Conventional film yielded superior image quality that was statistically significant in almost all aspects of comparison. Conventional film was followed in image quality by DD, and SD provided the lowest quality images. Conventional film is still considered the gold standard to diagnose diseases affecting the jawbone. Recommendations: Improved software and hardware for digital imaging systems are now available and these improvements may now yield images that are comparable in quality to conventional film. However, we recommend that studies still use more observers and other statistical methods to produce ideal results. Keywords: Oral radiology, Digital radiography, Comparative radiographic study, Direct digital imaging, Semi-direct digital radiography 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Medicine 
690 |a R 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Saudi Dental Journal, Vol 26, Iss 4, Pp 145-150 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905214000601 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1013-9052 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8dc5f1c7fde247ad915a2f109cbc6b8f  |z Connect to this object online.