A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
Abstract Background Since Misoprostol Vaginal Insert (MVI - Misodel ®) was approved for labor induction in Europe in 2013, to date, no study has been published comparing MVI to Misoprostol vaginal tablets (MVT). The aim of this study, performed as part of a quality improvement project, was to compar...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Kjersti Engen Marsdal (Author), Ingvil Krarup Sørbye (Author), Lise C. Gaudernack (Author), Mirjam Lukasse (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2018-01-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study
by: Daniele Bolla, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006) -
Misoprostol sublingual versus vaginal para indução do parto Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor
by: Francisco Edson de Lucena Feitosa
Published: (2006) -
Pharmacokinetics of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for labor induction at term
by: Yana Vorontsova, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets
by: Axelina Eriksson, et al.
Published: (2020)