Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia

Background/Aims Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. Methods A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patient...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Main Authors: Koichi Hamada (Author), Koichiro Kawano (Author), Atsushi Yamauchi (Author), Ryota Koyanagi (Author), Yoshinori Horikawa (Author), Shinya Nishida (Author), Yoshiki Shiwa (Author), Noriyuki Nishino (Author), Michitaka Honda (Author)
Formato: Livro
Publicado em: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8e865d4aa3634d028edc1b229c4cdf5d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Koichi Hamada  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Koichiro Kawano  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Atsushi Yamauchi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ryota Koyanagi  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yoshinori Horikawa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Shinya Nishida  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Yoshiki Shiwa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Noriyuki Nishino  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Michitaka Honda  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Esophageal Neoplasms under General Anesthesia 
260 |b Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,   |c 2019-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2234-2400 
500 |a 2234-2443 
500 |a 10.5946/ce.2018.151 
520 |a Background/Aims Evidence that general anesthesia (GA) reduces the operative time of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is currently insufficient. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal ESD under GA. Methods A total of 227 lesions from 198 consecutive patients with superficial esophageal neoplasms treated by ESD at 3 Japanese institutions between April 2011 and September 2017 were included in this retrospective study. For ESD, GA and deep sedation (DS) were used in 102 (51.5%, GA group) and 96 patients (48.5%, DS group), respectively. Results There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, or comorbidities between the groups. In the GA group, the tumor size was larger (21 [3-77] mm vs. 14 [3-63] mm, p<0.001), luminal circumference was larger (≥2/3; 13.9% vs. 5.4%, p=0.042), procedure time was shorter (28 [5-202] min vs. 40 [8-249] min, p<0.001), and submucosal dissection speed was faster (25.2 [7.8-157.2] mm2 /min vs. 16.2 [2.4-41.3] mm2 /min, p<0.001). The rates of intraoperative perforation and aspiration pneumonia were lower in the GA group, but the difference did not achieve statistical significance (p=0.242 and p=0.242). Conclusions GA shortens the procedure time of esophageal ESD. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Esophageal cancer 
690 |a Endoscopic submucosal dissection 
690 |a Anesthesia 
690 |a Internal medicine 
690 |a RC31-1245 
690 |a Diseases of the digestive system. Gastroenterology 
690 |a RC799-869 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Clinical Endoscopy, Vol 52, Iss 3, Pp 252-257 (2019) 
787 0 |n http://www.e-ce.org/upload/pdf/ce-2018-151.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2234-2400 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2234-2443 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8e865d4aa3634d028edc1b229c4cdf5d  |z Connect to this object online.