Determination of serum lithium: comparison between atomic emission and absorption spectrometry methods

Introduction: The therapeutic monitoring of lithium, through concentration measurements, is important for individual dose adjustment, as a marker of treatment adherence and to prevent poisoning and side effects. Objectives: Validate and compare two methods - atomic emission and atomic absorption - f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carlos Elielton do Espírito Santo (Author), Teresa Maria de Jesus Ponte Carvalho (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica, 2014-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8e8da4efc64645bc949c0981639d13f1
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Carlos Elielton do Espírito Santo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Teresa Maria de Jesus Ponte Carvalho  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Determination of serum lithium: comparison between atomic emission and absorption spectrometry methods 
260 |b Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica,   |c 2014-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1678-4774 
500 |a 10.1590/S1676-24442014000100002 
520 |a Introduction: The therapeutic monitoring of lithium, through concentration measurements, is important for individual dose adjustment, as a marker of treatment adherence and to prevent poisoning and side effects. Objectives: Validate and compare two methods - atomic emission and atomic absorption - for the determination of lithium in serum samples. Methodology: Parameters such as specificity, precision, accuracy, limit of detection (LOD) and linearity were considered. The atomic absorption spectrometer was used, operating in either emission or absorption mode. For the quantitative comparison of 30 serum samples from patients with mood disorder treated with lithium, the results were submitted to Student's t-test, F-test and Pearson's correlation. Results: The limit of quantification (LOQ) was established as 0.05 mEq/l of lithium, and calibration curves were constructed in the range of 0.05-2 mEq/l of lithium, using aqueous standards. Sample preparation time was reduced, what is important in medical laboratory. Conclusion: Both methods were considered satisfactory, precise and accurate and can be adopted for lithium quantification. In the comparison of quantitative results in lithium-treated patients through statistical tests, no significant differences were observed. Therefore the methods for lithium quantification by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) and flame atomic emission spectrometry (FAES) may be considered similar. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a lítio 
690 |a validação 
690 |a espectrometria de absorção atômica 
690 |a espectrometria de emissão atômica 
690 |a Pathology 
690 |a RB1-214 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, Vol 50, Iss 1, Pp 12-19 (2014) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442014000100012&lng=en&tlng=en 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4774 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8e8da4efc64645bc949c0981639d13f1  |z Connect to this object online.