Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes in the Last Five Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Summary: Purpose: Evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes is unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We conducted a search on databases from November 11 to 19...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DaeEun Lee (Author), Haejung Lee (Author), YoonYoung Shin (Author), Gaeun Park (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Elsevier, 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8ed8a0d60f3a4ec18c3e4ec8b66a0639
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a DaeEun Lee  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Haejung Lee  |e author 
700 1 0 |a YoonYoung Shin  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Gaeun Park  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effectiveness of Non-pharmacological Interventions for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes in the Last Five Years: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 
260 |b Elsevier,   |c 2024-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1976-1317 
500 |a 10.1016/j.anr.2024.01.008 
520 |a Summary: Purpose: Evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for adolescents with type 1 diabetes is unclear. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Methods: We conducted a search on databases from November 11 to 19, 2022, for randomized controlled trials for the effects of non-pharmacological intervention in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. To identify recent research trends, we included studies published from 2017 to November 2022. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0. To estimate the effect size, a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 program and R Studio. Results: A total of 45 studies were included in the systematic review. Among those, 30 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Non-pharmacological interventions were significantly effective in improving Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (standardized mean difference [SMD] = −0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.42, −0.09), quality of life (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.76), and anxiety (SMD = −0.91, 95% CI: −1.26, −0.56). Subgroup analysis showed that duration of intervention was not a covariate related to HbA1c levels. Conclusions: Non-pharmacological interventions have shown effectiveness in improving the HbA1c, quality of life, and anxiety in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Future studies with more rigorous methodology are needed to confirm and strengthen the validity of these findings. Additionally, attention to changes in the lipid profile and self-care motivation among adolescents with type 1 diabetes is warranted. Trial registration number: Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42022382190). 
546 |a EN 
690 |a adolescent 
690 |a diabetes mellitus 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a randomized controlled trial 
690 |a type 1 
690 |a Nursing 
690 |a RT1-120 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Asian Nursing Research, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp 51-59 (2024) 
787 0 |n http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131724000082 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1976-1317 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8ed8a0d60f3a4ec18c3e4ec8b66a0639  |z Connect to this object online.