Dependency Between Grammatical Structure of Language and Verbal Thinking Strategies

The article contains a discussion of how the grammatical structure of a language determines sentence structure and affects verbal thinking strategy. The stages of languages' historic development (incorporative, ergative, nominative) and the relationship between sentence structure and native spe...

Deskribapen osoa

Gorde:
Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Ekaterina V. Savitskaya (Egilea)
Formatua: Liburua
Argitaratua: Publishing house "Sreda", 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z.
Gaiak:
Sarrera elektronikoa:Connect to this object online.
Etiketak: Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8ee0a9da13ef4e9ea8161773a1e4c981
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Ekaterina V. Savitskaya  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Dependency Between Grammatical Structure of Language and Verbal Thinking Strategies 
260 |b Publishing house "Sreda",   |c 2020-09-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2713-1688 
500 |a 2713-1696 
500 |a 10.31483/r-86032 
520 |a The article contains a discussion of how the grammatical structure of a language determines sentence structure and affects verbal thinking strategy. The stages of languages' historic development (incorporative, ergative, nominative) and the relationship between sentence structure and native speakers' thinking are characterized. The common case of the grammatical subject of a sentence does mean that Anglo-Saxons regard themselves as their own fortune's active makers and masters. The common case equally expresses success and failure, activity and passivity, self-will and conformity. Nowadays, languages of all the three types coexist on the Globe. The languages of the first two types are used not only by primitive peoples but also by civilized nations. But this does not mean that civilized speakers think archaically. Methods and conclusions. Contrastive analysis of language material (English personal and Russian impersonal morphosyntactic constructions) enables the author to conclude: there is no direct correlation between national character and sentence structure. The connection between thinking and grammar does not consist in this; it consists in the choice of thinking strategies based on the grammatical potential of the language under discussion. 
546 |a EN 
546 |a RU 
690 |a analytical structure of language 
690 |a semantic role 
690 |a stages of language development 
690 |a synthetic structure of language 
690 |a verbal thinking 
690 |a аналитический строй языка 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Этническая культура, Vol , Iss 3 (4), Pp 35-39 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.31483/r-86032 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2713-1688 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2713-1696 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8ee0a9da13ef4e9ea8161773a1e4c981  |z Connect to this object online.