Baseline status regarding compliance with neo-BFHI recommendations in South African neonatal wards: a cross-sectional survey

• Main Authors: Welma Lubbe (Author), Lisa Springer (Author), Ragnhild Maastrup (Author), Laura N. Haiek (Author), Madimetja Nyaloko (Author)
• Format: Book
• Published: BMC, 2023-05-01T00:00:00Z.
• Subjects: article
• Online Access: Connect to this object online.
• Notes: 10.1186/s12913-023-09396-6; 1472-6963
• Keywords: Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative; Breastfeeding; Compliance; Neonatal wards; Infant; Kangaroo mother care; Public aspects of medicine; RA1-1270
• Source: BMC Health Services Research, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2023)

Abstract Background In 2009, the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund issued a revised Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) package to encourage all healthcare facilities to promote the advice of exclusive breastfeeding. The scope of the BFHI was expanded to include neonatal units by the Nordic and Quebec Working Group. Aim To determine the level of compliance with the recommendations outlined in the "Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative for neonatal wards" (Neo-BFHI) in the South African neonatal wards. Method In this cross-sectional survey, the sample included neonatal wards (N = 33) from public and private hospital facilities. Using EasyTrial software, the Neo-BFHI self-assessment questionnaire was utilized to collect the data. The data was transferred to MS Excel (version 15.0.5127.1000) and analysed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 24. Results The South African median score for Neo-BFHI compliance was 77. Neonatal wards in public hospitals scored higher (85) than those in private hospitals (73). Neonatal wards in hospitals that were accredited Baby-friendly had higher compliance scores than those without accreditation. The country had the highest compliance scores (100, 90) on Guiding Principle 1 (respect towards mothers) and step 5 (breastfeeding support), respectively. However, it scored low (71, 58) on steps 4 (enhancing kangaroo mother care) and 7 (maternal infant "togetherness"), respectively. Level 1 and 2 care facilities scored significantly higher than level 3. Conclusion Although South Africa successfully implemented the Neo-BFHI recommendations, private hospitals had a smaller number of BFHI-accredited facilities and lower compliance than public hospitals. Strategies should be developed to strengthen and improve BFHI accreditation and compliance, particularly in private hospitals.