E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses

The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Scie...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amund Riiser (Author), Elling Bere (Author), Lars Bo Andersen (Author), Solveig Nordengen (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Frontiers Media S.A., 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8f8018bb7ea64eb09a83ff0d81ef41d5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Amund Riiser  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elling Bere  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elling Bere  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Elling Bere  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lars Bo Andersen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Solveig Nordengen  |e author 
245 0 0 |a E-cycling and health benefits: A systematic literature review with meta-analyses 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2022-10-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 2624-9367 
500 |a 10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004 
520 |a The objective of the present study is to review and meta-analyze the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. We included longitudinal experimental and cohort studies investigating the effect of E-cycling on health outcomes. The studies were identified from the seven electronic databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cinahl and SportDiscus and risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2). We performed meta-analysis with random effects models on outcomes presented in more than one study. Our study includes one randomized controlled trial, five quasi experimental trials and two longitudinal cohort studies. The trials included 214 subjects of whom 77 were included in control groups, and the cohort studies included 10,222 respondents at baseline. Maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output were assessed in four and tree trials including 78 and 57 subjects, respectively. E-cycling increased maximal oxygen consumption and maximal power output with 0.48 SMD (95%CI 0.16-0.80) and 0.62 SMD (95%CI 0.24-0.99). One trial reported a decrease in 2-h post plasma glucoses from 5.53 ± 1.18 to 5.03 ± 0.91 mmol L−1 and one cohort study reported that obese respondents performed 0.21 times more trips on E-bike than respondents with normal weight. All the included studies had a high risk of bias due to flaws in randomization. However, the outcomes investigated in most studies showed that E-cycling can improve health. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a active transportation 
690 |a E-bicycle 
690 |a health 
690 |a fitness 
690 |a meta-analysis 
690 |a Sports 
690 |a GV557-1198.995 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, Vol 4 (2022) 
787 0 |n https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fspor.2022.1031004/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2624-9367 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8f8018bb7ea64eb09a83ff0d81ef41d5  |z Connect to this object online.