Roundtable Discussion in Language Teaching: Assessing Subject Knowledge and Language Skills

Roundtable discussions have been effectively used for educational purposes for years. However, being widely used in an academic environment as a tool for education, roundtable discussions remain under-investigated as a form of summative and formative assessment. The purpose of this research was to d...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Aida Rodomanchenko (Autor)
Formato: Libro
Publicado: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Connect to this object online.
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_8fcf3d1e97f6486ba9187bc77e711a7b
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aida Rodomanchenko  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Roundtable Discussion in Language Teaching: Assessing Subject Knowledge and Language Skills 
260 |b National Research University Higher School of Economics,   |c 2017-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2017-3-4-44-51 
500 |a 2411-7390 
520 |a Roundtable discussions have been effectively used for educational purposes for years. However, being widely used in an academic environment as a tool for education, roundtable discussions remain under-investigated as a form of summative and formative assessment. The purpose of this research was to determine the efficiency of a roundtable discussion to evaluate subject knowledge and to test EFL/ESL proficiency level both during the classroom assessment and final examination. To use a roundtable discussion as an objective assessment tool, clear criteria were developed. They included but were not limited to scoring the task completion, macro and micro skills in speaking and language components, which were assessed according to the CEFR descriptor bands appropriate to the students' level of learning. Being crucial to the development of general communicative competence, macro and micro skills in speaking were also taken into account during the assessment stage. Results of the research showed that roundtable discussions were clearly advantageous to face-to-face interviews in honing general academic skills, assessing subject knowledge of the course and students' EFL/ESL language skills. This suggests that the use of roundtable discussions can be recommended as a form of summative and formative assessment. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a roundtable discussion 
690 |a macro- and micro skills in speaking 
690 |a evaluation criteria 
690 |a summative and formative assessment 
690 |a cefr 
690 |a efl/esl 
690 |a communicative competence 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Philology. Linguistics 
690 |a P1-1091 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Language and Education, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 44-51 (2017) 
787 0 |n https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/7142/8243 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2411-7390 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/8fcf3d1e97f6486ba9187bc77e711a7b  |z Connect to this object online.