Do you pay to go private?: a single centre comparison of induction of labour and caesarean section rates in private versus public patients
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare rates of induction and subsequent caesarean delivery among nulliparous women with private versus publicly funded health care at a single institution. This is a retrospective cohort study using the electronic booking and delivery records of nul...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Simon Craven (Author), Fionnuala Byrne (Author), Rhona Mahony (Author), Jennifer M. Walsh (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2020-12-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
A randomised control trial of low glycaemic index carbohydrate diet versus no dietary intervention in the prevention of recurrence of macrosomia
by: Foley Michael, et al.
Published: (2010) -
Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020) -
Foley Catheter versus Vaginal Misoprostol for Labour Induction
by: Nasreen Noor, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Elective induction versus spontaneous labour in Latin America
by: Gláucia Virgínia Guerra, et al.
Published: (2011) -
Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?
by: Jill M. Mitchell, et al.
Published: (2022)