Cover Image

Evaluation and Comparison of Fracture Strength and Fluoride Releasing Properties of New Alkasite Materials with Conventional Restorative Material, Bulk Fill Composite and Glass Ionomer Cement: An In-Vitro Study

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare fluoride ion release by Cention-N (self-cure and light-cure) and conventional glass-ionomer cement (GIC) at different pH levels and time intervals. Methodology: For fluoride release assessment, 240 samples (10 mm diameter, 2 mm height) of Cention-N and c...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Savan K. Kashiyani (Author), Shreya A. Khanna (Author), Leena Jobanputra (Author), Niharika Patel (Author), Hirenkumar P. Patel (Author), Apoorva D. Patel (Author)
Format:	Book
Published:	Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:	article
Online Access:	Connect to this object online.
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Comparative evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of an alkasite restorative material with glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cement
by: Dhanraj Kalaivanan, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparative Evaluation of Fluoride Release From Two Different Glass Ionomer Cement and a Novel Alkasite Restorative Material - An in Vitro Study
by: Harpreet Singh, et al.
Published: (2022)

A comparative evaluation of fracture toughness, flexural strength, and acid buffer capability of a bulk-fill alkasite with high-strength glass-ionomer cement: An in vitro study
by: Madhuri Sai Battula, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of conventional glass-ionomer cement and bulk-fill alkasite material when combined with doxycycline and double antibiotic paste containing ciprofloxacin and metronidazole against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp.: An in vitro study
by: Riddhi Shripad Joshi, et al.
Published: (2020)

Comparative evaluation of mechanical and physical properties of a new bulk-fill alkasite with conventional restorative materials
by: Fariha Naz, et al.
Published: (2021)

Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of an alkasite restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vivo study
by: M P Pooja, et al.
Published: (2022)

Comparison of microleakage of an alkasite restorative material, a composite resin and a resin-modified glass ionomer
by: Fariba Motevasselian, et al.
Published: (2021)

PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE RESIN ALKASIT AND ZIRCONIA-REINFORCED GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT IN DIFFERENT STORAGE
by: Clarinda Vinindya, et al.
Published: (2020)

Microleakage of conventional, resin-modified, and nano-ionomer glass ionomer cement as primary teeth filling material
by: Dita Madyarani, et al.
Published: (2014)

A Descriptive Study of Alkasite, Bulk Fill, and Fiber-Reinforced Restoration Bioactivities
by: Shaymaa A. AL Dabbagh, et al.
Published: (2024)

Push-out bond strength of alkasite restorative material and bulk-fill composite used with universal adhesive system: An in vitro study
by: Nikita Goyal, et al.
Published: (2023)

Comparative evaluation of surface roughness and wettability of an alkasite with nano bulk-fill and nanofilled resin composite restorative materials: In vitro study
by: Shrehya Shekhar, et al.
Published: (2022)

Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer with Nano Filled Coat and Varnish
by: Valentina Brzović Rajić, et al.
Published: (2018)

Do conventional glass ionomer cements release more fluoride than resin-modified glass ionomer cements?
by: Maria Fernanda Costa Cabral, et al.
Published: (2015)

Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer
by: Sayed Mostafa Mousavinasab, et al.
Published: (2009)

Fluoride release and uptake in enhanced bioactivity glass ionomer cement ("glass carbomer™") compared with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements
by: Ammar M. H. R. HASAN, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comparative evaluation of microleakage in conventional glass ionomer cements and triclosan incorporated glass ionomer cements
by: Rani Somani, et al.
Published: (2014)

Evaluation of Fluoride Release in Chitosan-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements
by: Cruz Nishanthine, et al.
Published: (2022)

"Effect of nano-filled surface coating agent on fluoride release from conventional glass ionomer cement: An in vitro trial"
by: S Tiwari, et al.
Published: (2013)

Fluoride release and surface roughness of a new glass ionomer cement: glass carbomer
by: Célia Maria Condeixa de França LOPES, et al.
Published: (2018)

Fluoride release and recharge abilities of zinc-reinforced glass ionomer cement in comparison to traditional high strength glass ionomers
by: Adel Ahmed Bamoussa, et al.
Published: (2015)

Evaluation of Fluoride Release, pH and Microhardness of Glass Ionomer Cements
by: Andreia Medeiros Rodrigues Cardoso, et al.
Published: (2015)

Effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride application on microhardness of glass ionomer cement
by: Mohammad Azrul Izzudin, et al.
Published: (2015)

Shear Bond Strength of Bulk-Fill Composites to Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Evaluated by Different Adhesion Protocols
by: Bin-Shuwaish MS
Published: (2020)

Comparison of the amount of fluoride release from nanofilled resin modified glass ionomer, conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements.
by: Sumitha Upadhyay, et al.
Published: (2013)

Fluoride Release of Fresh and Aged Glass Ionomer Cements after Recharging with High-Fluoride Dentifrice
by: Fabiana Gouveia Rolim, et al.
Published: (2019)

Selective carious tissue removal and glass ionomer liner reduction of pulp stress in bulk fill resin composite restorations
by: Monise de Paula Rodrigues, et al.
Published: (2021)

Fluoride release from conventional, resin-modified and hybrid glass ionomer cements
by: Ležaja-Zebić Maja, et al.
Published: (2018)

The Effect of Heat Application on Fluoride Release in Antibacterial Added Glass Ionomer Cement
by: Ayça Kurt, et al.
Published: (2019)

Can bulk-fill resin restorations be an alternative to resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars of toddlers? A randomized clinical trial protocol
by: Isabela Coelho Novaes, et al.
Published: (2021)

Analysis of marginal seal of ProRoot MTA, MTA Angelus biodentine, and glass ionomer cement as root-end filling materials: An in vitro study
by: Sakshi Malhotra, et al.
Published: (2015)

Evaluation of apical sealing ability of ActiV GP/glass ionomer sealer as a root filling material
by: Souzan Ahmad Kassar, et al.
Published: (2018)

Fluoride exchange by glass-ionomer dental cements and its clinical effects: a review
by: John W. Nicholson, et al.
Published: (2023)

The hardness and chemical changes in demineralized primary dentin treated by fluoride and glass ionomer cement
by: Gisele Fernandes DIAS, et al.

A comparative evaluation of the marginal sealing ability and compressive strength of different restorative materials - Type VII glass-ionomer cement, Type IX glass-ionomer cement, and intermediate restorative material: An in-vitro study
by: S Rajakumar, et al.
Published: (2019)

Comparison of glass ionomer cement and resin as sealing materials: Systematic review of clinical trials
by: Karadimitriou Maria-Despoina, et al.
Published: (2024)

Comparative evaluation of osteogenic potential of conventional glass-ionomer cement with chitosan-modified glass-ionomer and bioactive glass-modified glass-ionomer cement - An In vitro study
by: Muthukrishnan Sudharshana Ranjani, et al.
Published: (2021)

Comparative evaluation of sealing ability of light cure glass ionomer cement and light cure composite as coronal sealing material: An in vitro study
by: Pragya Jaiswal, et al.
Published: (2017)

Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge of pre-reacted glass ionomer composite and nano-ionomeric glass ionomer with daily fluoride exposure: An in vitro study
by: Jayanthi Mungara, et al.
Published: (2013)

An in vitro study of fluoride-preloaded halloysite nanotubes to enhance the fluoride release in conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements
by: Martha Esperanza García-Moreno, et al.
Published: (2024)