CRISP3 glycoprotein: a good biomarker for prostate cancer?

ABSTRACT Introduction: Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 (CRISP3) is expressed at low levels in normal human prostate but often overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). The relevance of this overexpression for the malignancy of PCa is still unclear. The prognostic value of the currently used prostate...

पूर्ण विवरण

में बचाया:
ग्रंथसूची विवरण
मुख्य लेखकों: Aparecida de Lourdes Carvalho (लेखक), Sebastião A. Pinto (लेखक), Wagner G. dos Santos (लेखक)
स्वरूप: पुस्तक
प्रकाशित: Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica, 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z.
विषय:
ऑनलाइन पहुंच:Connect to this object online.
टैग: टैग जोड़ें
कोई टैग नहीं, इस रिकॉर्ड को टैग करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_92ee7d9aa6f3434f9195cb5e7df78d02
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Aparecida de Lourdes Carvalho  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sebastião A. Pinto  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Wagner G. dos Santos  |e author 
245 0 0 |a CRISP3 glycoprotein: a good biomarker for prostate cancer? 
260 |b Sociedade Brasileira de Patologia Clínica,   |c 2021-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1678-4774 
500 |a 10.5935/1676-2444.20210012 
520 |a ABSTRACT Introduction: Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 (CRISP3) is expressed at low levels in normal human prostate but often overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). The relevance of this overexpression for the malignancy of PCa is still unclear. The prognostic value of the currently used prostate specific antigen (PSA) test can be misleading under certain circumstances, resulting in overtreatment of indolent tumors. New biomarkers are needed to reduce overtreatment and improve quality of life of men. Objective: Evaluate if CRISP3 expression could be a good biomarker for PCa. Methods: CRISP3 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in tissue sections of prostate cancer from twenty-five patients subjected to radical prostatectomy. Gleason grading system was used as prognostic indicator and the staging of PCa was defined using the TNM system. Clinical parameters and PSA levels before and after surgery were determined. Results: CRISP3 expression was strong in 14 (56%), moderate in four (16%) and weak in seven (28%) specimens. There was no correlation between the intensity of CRISP3 expression and pre- and post-treatment PSA levels. Fifteen (60%) of PCa biopsies showed extension of the primary tumor pT2. Seven patients (28%) showed Gleason score higher than 7; thirteen (52%) equal to 7, and five (20%) lower than 7. There were no significant statistical differences between Gleason score and CRISP3 expression. Conclusion: CRISP3 is expressed in prostate cancer at different levels. Additional studies are required to better evaluate if CRISP3 could be used as a biomarker. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a prostate specific antigen 
690 |a immunohistochemistry 
690 |a prostatic neoplasms 
690 |a prostatectomy 
690 |a pathology molecular 
690 |a Pathology 
690 |a RB1-214 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, Vol 57 (2021) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442021000100407&tlng=en 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1676-24442021000100407&tlng=pt 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jbpml/v57/1676-2444-jbpml-57-e3222021.pdf 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jbpml/v57/pt_1676-2444-jbpml-57-e3222021.pdf 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-4774 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/92ee7d9aa6f3434f9195cb5e7df78d02  |z Connect to this object online.