Leptospira interrogans in mammals in Lviv Oblast, Ukraine, 2001-2015.

This study describes changes in the prevalence of Leptospira interrogans infections among small mammals, including rats and larger domestic and wild mammals in Lviv Oblast, a region in western Ukraine from 2001-2015, using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). A total of 439,948 domestic or wild...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Olena Zubach (Author), Oksana Semenyshyn (Author), Lesya Hatsji (Author), Mykhaylo Demchyshyn (Author), Aleksander Zinchuk (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_93146a38096049c59c7a97bbb5dca299
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Olena Zubach  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Oksana Semenyshyn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Lesya Hatsji  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mykhaylo Demchyshyn  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Aleksander Zinchuk  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Leptospira interrogans in mammals in Lviv Oblast, Ukraine, 2001-2015. 
260 |b Public Library of Science (PLoS),   |c 2019-12-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1935-2727 
500 |a 1935-2735 
500 |a 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007793 
520 |a This study describes changes in the prevalence of Leptospira interrogans infections among small mammals, including rats and larger domestic and wild mammals in Lviv Oblast, a region in western Ukraine from 2001-2015, using the microscopic agglutination test (MAT). A total of 439,948 domestic or wild animals were tested. We found the prevalence of Leptospira interrogans exposure varied among tested species and changed over the time. Infection was significantly less common in domestic animals, than in wild rodents. In swine the overall seroprevalence was 0.51%, while in cattle it was 0.19%. In dogs it was higher-2.75%. After 2006, evidence of infection was only observed in swine among domestic animals. The prevalence among large wild animals (0.25%) was similar to that among domestic animals. Among small mammals and rats, seroprevalence was most commonly observed among Rattus norvegicus (18.44%) and it was less common among other wild small mammals (8.74%). There were two dominant serogroups among large wild and domestic animals-L. icterohaemorrhagiae and L. hebdomadis while among wild small mammals the two most common were L. icterohaemorrhagiae and L. grippotyphosa. Wild animals with antibodies were found throughout the entire oblast. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Arctic medicine. Tropical medicine 
690 |a RC955-962 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol 13, Iss 12, p e0007793 (2019) 
787 0 |n https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007793 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2727 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1935-2735 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/93146a38096049c59c7a97bbb5dca299  |z Connect to this object online.