Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
ObjectivesTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.MethodsA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European...
Sábháilte in:
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formáid: | LEABHAR |
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: |
Frontiers Media S.A.,
2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Ábhair: | |
Rochtain ar líne: | Connect to this object online. |
Clibeanna: |
Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_93c1566c5e1246a1a510588ed45f07a9 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Sofia Guerra-Paiva |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sofia Guerra-Paiva |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Irene Carrillo |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a José Mira |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a José Mira |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Joana Fernandes |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Reinhard Strametz |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Eva Gil-Hernández |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Paulo Sousa |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Paulo Sousa |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach |
260 | |b Frontiers Media S.A., |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 1661-8564 | ||
500 | |a 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428 | ||
520 | |a ObjectivesTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.MethodsA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.ResultsFrom an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.ConclusionThis study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a patient safety | ||
690 | |a second victim | ||
690 | |a programs | ||
690 | |a evaluation | ||
690 | |a indicators | ||
690 | |a Public aspects of medicine | ||
690 | |a RA1-1270 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n International Journal of Public Health, Vol 69 (2024) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428/full | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8564 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/93c1566c5e1246a1a510588ed45f07a9 |z Connect to this object online. |