Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach

ObjectivesTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.MethodsA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European...

Cur síos iomlán

Sábháilte in:
Sonraí bibleagrafaíochta
Príomhchruthaitheoirí: Sofia Guerra-Paiva (Údar), Irene Carrillo (Údar), José Mira (Údar), Joana Fernandes (Údar), Reinhard Strametz (Údar), Eva Gil-Hernández (Údar), Paulo Sousa (Údar)
Formáid: LEABHAR
Foilsithe / Cruthaithe: Frontiers Media S.A., 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z.
Ábhair:
Rochtain ar líne:Connect to this object online.
Clibeanna: Cuir clib leis
Níl clibeanna ann, Bí ar an gcéad duine le clib a chur leis an taifead seo!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_93c1566c5e1246a1a510588ed45f07a9
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Sofia Guerra-Paiva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sofia Guerra-Paiva  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Irene Carrillo  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Mira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Mira  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Joana Fernandes  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Reinhard Strametz  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Eva Gil-Hernández  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paulo Sousa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Paulo Sousa  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach 
260 |b Frontiers Media S.A.,   |c 2024-08-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 1661-8564 
500 |a 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428 
520 |a ObjectivesTo establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.MethodsA three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.ResultsFrom an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.ConclusionThis study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a patient safety 
690 |a second victim 
690 |a programs 
690 |a evaluation 
690 |a indicators 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n International Journal of Public Health, Vol 69 (2024) 
787 0 |n https://www.ssph-journal.org/articles/10.3389/ijph.2024.1607428/full 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1661-8564 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/93c1566c5e1246a1a510588ed45f07a9  |z Connect to this object online.