Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites

The use of composite resins in dentistry is well accepted for restoring anterior and posterior teeth. Many polishing protocols have been evaluated for their effect on the surface roughness of restorative materials. This study compared the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughnes...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe (Author), Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida (Author), Igor Studart Medeiros (Author), José Ferreira Costa (Author), Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves (Author)
Format: Book
Published: University of São Paulo, 2009-02-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_947fdc9cff3f4675be3f5eba6f11e374
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Igor Studart Medeiros  |e author 
700 1 0 |a José Ferreira Costa  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites 
260 |b University of São Paulo,   |c 2009-02-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 10.1590/S1678-77572009000100005 
500 |a 1678-7757 
500 |a 1678-7765 
520 |a The use of composite resins in dentistry is well accepted for restoring anterior and posterior teeth. Many polishing protocols have been evaluated for their effect on the surface roughness of restorative materials. This study compared the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites. Thirty-six specimens were prepared for each composite $#91;Charisma® (Heraeus Kulzer), Fill Magic® (Vigodent), TPH Spectrum® (Dentsply), Z100® (3M/ESPE) and Z250® (3M/ESPE)] and submitted to surface treatment with Enhance® and PoGo® (Dentsply) points, sequential Sof-Lex XT® aluminum oxide disks (3M/ESPE), and felt disks (TDV) combined with Excel® diamond polishing paste (TDV). Average surface roughness (Ra) was measured with a mechanical roughness tester. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with repetition of the factorial design and the Tukey-Kramer test (p<0.01). The F-test result for treatments and resins was high (p<0.0001 for both), indicating that the effect of the treatment applied to the specimen surface and the effect of the type of resin on surface roughness was highly significant. Regarding the interaction between polishing system and type of resin used, a p value of 0.0002 was obtained, indicating a statistically significant difference. A Ra of 1.3663 was obtained for the Sof-Lex/TPH Spectrum interaction. In contrast, the Ra for the felt disk+paste/Z250 interactions was 0.1846. In conclusion, Sof-Lex polishing system produced a higher surface roughness on TPH Spectrum resin when compared to the other interactions. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a Dental materials 
690 |a Composite resins 
690 |a Dental polishing 
690 |a Dentistry 
690 |a RK1-715 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Applied Oral Science, Vol 17, Iss 1, Pp 21-26 (2009) 
787 0 |n http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000100005 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7757 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1678-7765 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/947fdc9cff3f4675be3f5eba6f11e374  |z Connect to this object online.