The impact of office design on medically certified sickness absence

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of three different office designs (cellular office, shared office, and open-plan workspace) on the risk of medically certified sickness absence and the number of days, respectively, of medically certified sickness absence over a 12-month f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten Birkeland Nielsen (Author), Stein Knardahl (Author)
Format: Book
Published: Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH), 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_94f44d9963144b71bcf743bcb9c9a0a5
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Morten Birkeland Nielsen  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Stein Knardahl  |e author 
245 0 0 |a The impact of office design on medically certified sickness absence 
260 |b Nordic Association of Occupational Safety and Health (NOROSH),   |c 2020-05-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a 0355-3140 
500 |a 1795-990X 
500 |a 10.5271/sjweh.3859 
520 |a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of three different office designs (cellular office, shared office, and open-plan workspace) on the risk of medically certified sickness absence and the number of days, respectively, of medically certified sickness absence over a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: The study relied on a combination of self-report survey questionnaire data on office design supplemented with official registry data number of days with sickness absence from the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration. The sample comprised 6328 Norwegian office workers (57% women, age range: 19-70 years, mean age: 44 years). RESULTS: Adjusting for survey year, employees working in a shared office [risk ratios (RR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.27] and an open-plan workspace (RR 1.12, 95% CI 1.02-1.22) had significantly higher risk of having had medically instances of certified sickness absence when compared to employees working in a cellular-office. Office design was not related to the number of days with absence. The associations were consistent across organizational affiliation, age, gender, whether the respondent had leadership responsibility, and educational level. CONCLUSION: The use of shared offices and open-plan workspaces is a risk factor for medically certified sickness absence. Providing employees with the opportunity to work in cellular offices may reduce absence rates. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a sickness absence 
690 |a open-plan office 
690 |a open office 
690 |a health 
690 |a sickness absence 
690 |a shared office 
690 |a workability 
690 |a registry data 
690 |a cellular office 
690 |a office design 
690 |a medically certified sickness absence 
690 |a shared workstation 
690 |a sick leave 
690 |a health 
690 |a Public aspects of medicine 
690 |a RA1-1270 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, Vol 46, Iss 3, Pp 330-334 (2020) 
787 0 |n  https://www.sjweh.fi/show_abstract.php?abstract_id=3859  
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/0355-3140 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/1795-990X 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/94f44d9963144b71bcf743bcb9c9a0a5  |z Connect to this object online.