Identifying stakeholder preferences for communicating impact from medical research: a mixed methods study
Abstract Background Documentation of research outcomes using impact case studies (ICS) is increasingly required to demonstrate the wider societal benefits of research. However, there is limited evidence of the best way to communicate research outcomes using ICS, especially when highlighting research...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Katherine Pitrolino (Author), Buddhini Samarasinghe (Author), Andy Pringle (Author), Ian Viney (Author) |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
BMC,
2024-10-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Stakeholder identified research priorities for early intervention in psychosis
by: Laoise Renwick, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Stakeholder Preferences for Process and Outcomes in Community-University Research Partnerships: Implications for Research Collaborations
by: Karen Hutchins Bieluch, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Understanding multi‐stakeholder needs, preferences and expectations to define effective practices and processes of patient engagement in medicine development: A mixed‐methods study
by: Stuart D Faulkner, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Engaging multi-stakeholder perspectives to identify dementia care research priorities
by: Neela K. Patel, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Stakeholders' views of the Baby Friendly Initiative implementation and impact: a mixed methods study
by: Frankie Joy Fair, et al.
Published: (2024)