Instructional Goal Structure, Gender, and Second Language Motivation Affecting English Language Achievement

The study opted to: 1) Investigate differences between cooperative and competitive learning modes in the extent to which they affect English language achievement; 2) Find gender, intra-gender, and inter-gender differences in English language achievement within and across the cooperative, competitive...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lemecha Geleto Wariyo (Author)
Format: Book
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics, 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z.
Subjects:
Online Access:Connect to this object online.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

MARC

LEADER 00000 am a22000003u 4500
001 doaj_9935c73a7b8740bc9243ebafba2d065d
042 |a dc 
100 1 0 |a Lemecha Geleto Wariyo  |e author 
245 0 0 |a Instructional Goal Structure, Gender, and Second Language Motivation Affecting English Language Achievement 
260 |b National Research University Higher School of Economics,   |c 2020-03-01T00:00:00Z. 
500 |a https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2020.7766 
500 |a 2411-7390 
520 |a The study opted to: 1) Investigate differences between cooperative and competitive learning modes in the extent to which they affect English language achievement; 2) Find gender, intra-gender, and inter-gender differences in English language achievement within and across the cooperative, competitive, and control group learning conditions; and 3) Study the relationship between students' motivation to learn the English language and English language achievement. The cooperative and competitive learning groups were used as treatment groups while the control group was the individualized learning group. An English language test was administered to 120 secondary school grade nine students. The 12-item mini-Attitude/Motivation Test Battery (Mini-AMTB) was administered to the students. Different parametric tests were used in the pre-test and post-test data analysis. Post-test data analysis results revealed that cooperative learners significantly outperformed both competitive learners and the control group, but the control group significantly outperformed competitive learners. The gender difference in English language achievement was not significant. The cooperative learning (CL) mode was favored by both male and female students but more favored by males. The five aggregate measures of the mini-AMTB (Integrativeness, Motivational Intensity, Attitudes towards the Learning Situation, Instrumental Orientation, and Parental Encouragement) produced significant positive correlations with English language achievement; however, Language Anxiety negatively and significantly correlated with English language achievement. The CL mode, with its effective CL technique, was recommended to be researched and applied by trained teachers to improve student achievement. Its implications for teacher training were also given. Treatment of second language motivation was recommended as an important issue in second language learning. 
546 |a EN 
690 |a cooperative learning 
690 |a competitive learning 
690 |a instructional goal structure 
690 |a second language motivation 
690 |a Education 
690 |a L 
690 |a Philology. Linguistics 
690 |a P1-1091 
655 7 |a article  |2 local 
786 0 |n Journal of Language and Education, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 134-156 (2020) 
787 0 |n https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/7766/12047 
787 0 |n https://doaj.org/toc/2411-7390 
856 4 1 |u https://doaj.org/article/9935c73a7b8740bc9243ebafba2d065d  |z Connect to this object online.