Large-Scale Predictions of Compound Potency with Original and Modified Activity Classes Reveal General Prediction Characteristics and Intrinsic Limitations of Conventional Benchmarking Calculations
Predicting compound potency is a major task in computational medicinal chemistry, for which machine learning is often applied. This study systematically predicted compound potency values for 367 target-based compound activity classes from medicinal chemistry using a preferred machine learning approa...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Book |
Published: |
MDPI AG,
2023-04-01T00:00:00Z.
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Connect to this object online. |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000 am a22000003u 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | doaj_994d8c50f1d845ba9491258efa5fe683 | ||
042 | |a dc | ||
100 | 1 | 0 | |a Tiago Janela |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Jürgen Bajorath |e author |
245 | 0 | 0 | |a Large-Scale Predictions of Compound Potency with Original and Modified Activity Classes Reveal General Prediction Characteristics and Intrinsic Limitations of Conventional Benchmarking Calculations |
260 | |b MDPI AG, |c 2023-04-01T00:00:00Z. | ||
500 | |a 10.3390/ph16040530 | ||
500 | |a 1424-8247 | ||
520 | |a Predicting compound potency is a major task in computational medicinal chemistry, for which machine learning is often applied. This study systematically predicted compound potency values for 367 target-based compound activity classes from medicinal chemistry using a preferred machine learning approach and simple control methods. The predictions produced unexpectedly similar results for different classes and comparably high accuracy for machine learning and simple control models. Based on these findings, the influence of different data set modifications on relative prediction accuracies was explored, including potency range balancing, removal of nearest neighbors, and analog series-based compound partitioning. The predictions were surprisingly resistant to these modifications, leading to only small error margin increases. These findings also show that conventional benchmark settings are unsuitable for directly comparing potency prediction methods. | ||
546 | |a EN | ||
690 | |a compound potency predictions | ||
690 | |a activity classes | ||
690 | |a machine learning | ||
690 | |a nearest neighbor controls | ||
690 | |a benchmark calculations | ||
690 | |a Medicine | ||
690 | |a R | ||
690 | |a Pharmacy and materia medica | ||
690 | |a RS1-441 | ||
655 | 7 | |a article |2 local | |
786 | 0 | |n Pharmaceuticals, Vol 16, Iss 4, p 530 (2023) | |
787 | 0 | |n https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/16/4/530 | |
787 | 0 | |n https://doaj.org/toc/1424-8247 | |
856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://doaj.org/article/994d8c50f1d845ba9491258efa5fe683 |z Connect to this object online. |